Does Focal Length Differ for Convex Lenses?

AI Thread Summary
The focal length for convex lenses does not follow the same rule as concave lenses, which is one half the radius of curvature. Instead, the focal length for lenses is determined using the lensmaker's equation. For convex mirrors, the focal length is also related to the radius, but it is negative due to the nature of light reflection. This negative focal length indicates that the reflected beam diverges from a virtual source. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate optical calculations.
fromthepast
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I know that for concave lenses, the focal length is one half the length of the radius of the circle.

Is this also true for convex lenses?

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
fromthepast said:
I know that for concave lenses, the focal length is one half the length of the radius of the circle.
That's not true. Similar rule applies to mirrors, but not to lenses.
 
What I meant to say was:

"I know that for concave MIRRORS, the focal length is one half the length of the radius of the circle.

Is this also true for convex MIRRORS?"
 
Yes, it is.
Just draw yourself a picture how the light reflects from the spherical surface...
 
The number is the same for the same radius, but the sign flips - a convex mirror has a negative focal length, with the usual sign conventions. This makes sense if you think about it - a collimated object beam has the object at infinity, but the reflected beam diverges from a virtual source with a negative image distance. Therefore the focal length must be negative.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top