Does friction always result in energy loss?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of friction on a ball rolling down a ramp, specifically addressing whether friction results in energy loss. It is established that if the ramp is frictionless, the ball will slide without rotation. When friction is present, it can facilitate rotation without necessarily causing energy loss, provided the ball does not slide. Energy loss through friction can be negligible in scenarios such as a bowling ball rolling back up a ramp, but becomes significant in cases with excessive surface debris, like sand.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational and translational kinetic energy
  • Knowledge of nonconservative forces, specifically friction
  • Familiarity with the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Basic physics of motion on inclined planes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of friction in rotational motion dynamics
  • Study the effects of air resistance on moving objects in different environments
  • Explore energy conservation principles in non-ideal systems
  • Investigate the impact of surface materials on friction and energy loss
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of motion and energy conservation in systems involving friction.

TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
Hi,

If I have a ball at the top of a ramp, it will have rotational and translational kinetic energy as it begins moving. If the ramp was frictionless, just to confirm, would it be possible for the ball to rotate or would it just slide with the point of contact on the ramp fixed?

Also, if there is friction and the ball is allowed to rotate, will the ball lose energy while it goes from the top of the ramp to the bottom? To my understanding, friction is a nonconservative force and will result in energy dissipated from the system (i.e. the ball). But in this case, if friction is necessary for the ball to rotate, would I have to account for a loss of energy term when trying to figure out the ball's position, speed, and acceleration as it moves on the ramp? In this case, is the energy loss through friction negligible? Would it ever not be negligible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheCanadian said:
Hi,

If I have a ball at the top of a ramp, it will have rotational and translational kinetic energy as it begins moving. If the ramp was frictionless, just to confirm, would it be possible for the ball to rotate or would it just slide with the point of contact on the ramp fixed? (1)

Also, if there is friction and the ball is allowed to rotate, will the ball lose energy while it goes from the top of the ramp to the bottom? (2)

To my understanding, friction is a nonconservative force and will result in energy dissipated from the system (i.e. the ball). (3)
But in this case, if friction is necessary for the ball to rotate, would I have to account for a loss of energy term when trying to figure out the ball's position, speed, and acceleration as it moves on the ramp? In this case, is the energy loss through friction negligible? (4)
Would it ever not be negligible? (5)

(1) Yes: slide. There is no force to make it rotate.
(2) not necessarily: if it doesn't slide at all the friction force does no work.
(3) mechanical energy is not lost if the friction force only makes the ball rotate (see (2) )
(4) can be safely ignored for e.g. a returning bowling ball that rolls up the ramp for the next shot.
(5) e.g. if there's a lot of sand on a ramp

--
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheCanadian
BvU is correct about the ramp, although there is another form of friction- air resistance. Again, it is very negligible, however you would account for it if you want EXTREMELY precise measurements.
 
Yeah, for a styrofoam ball in heavy fog this doesn't fly at all. So let's assume vacuum :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
793