Does Gravity always move an object down the path with the steepest slope?

AI Thread Summary
Gravity does not always move an object down the steepest slope; it acts in conjunction with the normal force. The discussion revolves around the relationship between gravitational force and the surface slope, particularly in the context of a hemisphere. The assumption that gravity points down the steepest part of the surface is questioned, highlighting the need to consider the normal force's role. The conversation also touches on the implications of friction and how it affects the work done in moving an object. Understanding these forces is crucial for accurately modeling the movement along a surface.
PeteyCoco
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Does gravity always move an object down the path with the steepest slope?

I just finished reading about the vector gradient in calculus and a problem jumped in my head:

"Can I make a formula for the work it takes to push an object from the bottom of a hemisphere to the top along the surface with a constant angle of elevation θ to the xy-plane?"*

I think I worked it out, but I made the assumption the resultant force of gravity always points down the steepest part of the surface. This makes sense to me instinctively since an object is at rest when it's on a flat surface (max slope = 0), but I wanted to know if there was a better way to state this.

I'm having so much fun with these things :-p

*Friction is a variable so no W=mgh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I've understood the question, you are asking..

Does the resultant of gravity and the normal force allways act down the steepest part of the slope.

Perhaps think about the definition of the normal force.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top