Does Gravity Have a Speed Limit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astro_Will
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Speed
Astro_Will
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Does gravity have a finite speed at which it effects an object. For example (and this is strictly hypothetical) if a new star were to suddenly appear near the orbit of Saturn would Earth instantly notice the influence or would it take a few minutes? When I think of Newtonian gravity I would just assume it travels at c so we would notice the gravitational effects the same time we saw the light from that star. But with relativity I'm really just not sure because I don't know if the bending of spacetime has any speed limit. I hope I'm making myself clear here.

Also: If gravity does travel at c is that only in a vacuum?

(Also an explanation of the graviton and what that means for the idea of spacetime would be appreciated)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See the first entry in "Frequently Asked Relativity Questions" at the top of this forum. :smile:

Then if anything there needs to be clarified, ask away!
 
Astro_Will said:
Does gravity have a finite speed at which it effects an object.

This forum has a FAQ on this:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=635645

Also, the Usenet Physics FAQ gives a good overview:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html

Astro_Will said:
For example (and this is strictly hypothetical) if a new star were to suddenly appear near the orbit of Saturn

This is not just hypothetical, it's impossible. A star can't appear out of nowhere; that would violate conservation of energy. That means we can't even formulate a consistent mathematical model in General Relativity of what you are trying to describe. It turns out to be somewhat tricky to formulate a scenario that captures what we intuitively think of when we think of "changes in gravity propagating", and can also be consistently modeled in GR. However, when we do, as the FAQs above note, the answer we get is that gravity propagates at the speed of light.

Astro_Will said:
When I think of Newtonian gravity I would just assume it travels at c

No; the speed of gravity in Newton's theory is infinite. Just look at the expression for gravitational force:

F = \frac{G m_1 m_2}{r^2}

The m_1, m_2, and r in that equation are all evaluated "right now"--in Newton's theory there is absolute space and absolute time, so "right now" has a well-defined meaning. So if any variable changes, the entire Universe instantly "sees" the change. This is the main reason why Einstein, once he had come up with Special Relativity, had to then come up with a new theory of gravity--General Relativity: the old theory of gravity, Newton's, was obviously incompatible with relativity.

Astro_Will said:
If gravity does travel at c is that only in a vacuum?

I don't know that this aspect of the question has really been considered; all of the treatments that I'm aware of only talk about gravitational waves (which are the way changes in gravity propagate) in a vacuum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No questions. Thanks for this. I'll be sure to check the FAQ first from now on.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top