Does increasing mass reduce the bounciness of connected car tires?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Faded Maximus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact Mass Tire
AI Thread Summary
Increasing the mass of connected car tires may reduce their bounciness compared to a single tire due to the coupling effect when they bounce out of sync. When two tires are connected, one tire's upward motion can counteract the other's downward motion, creating a center of rotation that dissipates energy. While the height of the bounce remains the same for both configurations, the stability and energy loss from this coupling can lead to less effective bouncing. Thus, a single tire is likely to bounce better than two connected tires. Overall, the dynamics of connected tires introduce complexities that affect their bouncing behavior.
Faded Maximus
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Car tires seem to bounce very well however they are easily unbalanced and tend to tip over very easy. If you were to connect say 2 or 3 similar tires together and then dropped it, it should prevent the tires from tipping over and stop bouncing. This will however make the mass significantly larger. Since the mass is larger, will this effect the bouncyness of it allowing it to bounce less then a single tire?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have 2 tires, like a car axle, and they bounce out of sync, what happens is that one tire is going up while the other tire is going down. Having one side go up and one side go down means the axle now has a center of rotation, and having both gravity and bounciness act in the same rotational direction is called a "couple". You'll lose a lot of energy in this "coupling" effect.

Short answer: I think 1 tire would bounce better than 2.
 
Since the tires are identical, the height two tires bounce to is the same as the height one tire bounces to whether the tires are connected or not.

Stability while bouncing is a completely separate issue and coupling due to out of sync bouncing is a separate issue, though since we don't know what your point is, they may be relevant...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top