I Does Increasing PSI on a Boiler Increase its BHP Output?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gary K
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    boiler
AI Thread Summary
Increasing the PSI on a boiler does not necessarily correlate with a proportional increase in BHP output, as demonstrated in an experiment with a Cleaver Brooks 30bhp boiler. At 40 PSI, the boiler produced approximately 13bhp, but when the pressure was increased to 60, 80, 100, and 120 PSI with the gate valve fully open, the boiler struggled to maintain pressure, losing about 10 PSI per minute. The discussion raises the question of whether venting steam faster than the boiler can produce leads to a temporary increase in BHP usage beyond the rated capacity. Observations indicated that at lower valve openings, steam output was manageable, but at full opening, the system could not keep up, resulting in excessive steam release. The discrepancy in BHP calculations suggests a need for clearer understanding and measurement of steam output under varying conditions.
Gary K
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Just completed an experiment using a Cleaver Brooks 30bhp boiler rated at 140 PSI. At 40 PSI I did a "vent to atmosphere" test with a water meter attached to the boiler feed tank. I was able to find the equilibrium point of the boiler (didn't kick off, pressure remained fairly constant) over the course of an hour. The result of the test showed that the boiler was putting out about 13bhp. During the course of the experiment we found that this setting (40psi with a gate valve opened 1 1/4 turns) was not enough to produce the work we needed. Even with the gate valve opened 100% at 40psi we needed more power. We ended up ramping up the psi to 60, 80, 100 and 120. During all of these tests the gate valve was opened to 100% and of course the boiler could not keep up and lost about 10psi per minute. The steam we used was vented to atmosphere. The question is, when the gate valve was wide open at say 100 psi, were we still using about 13bhp or were we actually using far more than 13bhp as we were exceeding the boiler's capacity to maintain pressure? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can only vaguely guess what this question is about . Please explain more clearly what you are doing and show us a system diagram .
 
The point of the question is, If you vent a boiler to atmosphere faster than it can keep up, are you using more bhp (pounds per hour) than the boiler is rated for a brief period of time. When the gate valve was open about 1/8 we were seeing about 450 pounds per hour coming out of the pipe. When the same valve at the same pressure was opened 100% were we seeing more than 450 pounds per hour? We built a custom condenser that would condense 100% of the steam at 40 psi with the valve 1/8 open. When the valve was at 100% open the condenser could not keep up and copious amounts of steam came out. The boiler had a 2" outlet that was reduced to 1". About 70 feet of non-insulated black pipe lead to the outlet.
 
Gary K said:
a Cleaver Brooks 30bhp boiler rated at 140 PSI. At 40 PSI I did a "vent to atmosphere" ... the boiler was putting out about 13bhp
Why the large discrepancy in bhp? Something seems off in your calculation,
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top