Does Increasing the Elevation Affect Maximum Static Friction?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between elevation and maximum static friction on a rough surface. As the elevation increases, the static friction force does not increase due to the perpendicular force component; instead, it is influenced by the parallel force component acting on the object. The equations provided, FFriction = μ_static * mg * cos(θ) and FParallel = mg * sin(θ), illustrate that the slipping point remains constant and is determined solely by the static friction coefficient (μ_static) of the materials involved. However, the maximum static friction force decreases with increased elevation, akin to a lower mass on a horizontal plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static friction and its coefficient (μ_static)
  • Basic knowledge of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions and their application in physics
  • Ability to interpret equations related to forces acting on objects
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static friction and its coefficient (μ_static) in various materials
  • Learn about the application of Newton's laws in real-world scenarios
  • Explore the effects of angle and elevation on frictional forces through practical experiments
  • Investigate the relationship between mass, weight, and friction on inclined planes
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in the mechanics of friction and inclined planes will benefit from this discussion.

ap_cycles
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I place an object on a rough surface.

It is clear that the static friction will increase as you increase the elevation of the surface since there is a bigger component of weight acting down the plane surface.

But will the max static friction -i.e. friction at the verge of slipping be the same, even when you increase the elevation? I can't put a pulse to it, but my strong hunch is no.

What do fellow forummers think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elevation? How does elevation come into picture?
 
I assume he means elevate one end of the surface so its angled. Ideally, maximum static friction should be independent of angle, but in the real world there may be slight difference depending on the overall direction and magnitude of force and the size of the contact area.
 
So I am going to make some assumptions here:

1. by the increase in static friction, you mean the static friction force.
2. if you incline the plane, the static friction force DOES NOT increase because more force is exerted in the direction perpendicular to the plane. It increases because more force is exerted in the direction parallel to the surface. This is due to friction obeying Newtons third law. So basically friction will scale itself with the force that wants to move the object.

Ok now that we have these things out of the way, here's some equations that might help you in understanding this

FFriction = \mu_{static}mgcos(\theta)

where \theta changes between 0 and pi/2. \mustatic is the static friction coefficient of the material.

and the force parallel to the surface which wants the object to slip is

FParallel = mgsin(\theta)

so if you put these 2 equations with the domain D [0,pi/2] the point that they intersect will be the "Slipping point" and it will always be the same, and would ONLY depend on \mu_{static} which in terms would ONLY depend on your material and surface of contact.
Although if you mean if the static friction force at the slipping point is different or not for each different elevation, the answer is yes, it is. As you increase the elevation its the same as a lower mass on a horizontal plane in which case the maximum static friction force would be less.

I hope this helped, but your question was a bit vague. If my explanations did not help, feel free to clarify the question for me and i will try to help you more.
 
Last edited:
Dear fellow forummers and Lohrasp in particular,

Thanks for the replies. Yes, Lohrasp, you have interpreted my question correctly, and YES, i understood your explanation.

Thanks! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
6K