Does it make sense scientifically and linguistically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the linguistic and scientific clarity of a text describing high voltage and current generator tests conducted on a tent. Participants provide feedback on language usage, technical expressions, and overall coherence of the writing.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests feedback on their English writing, specifically looking for any grammatical errors or awkward phrasing.
  • Another participant suggests a correction regarding the article usage in "High current generator," proposing it should be "A high current generator."
  • Some participants express that the term "scorches" is acceptable, but "some scorching" is more commonly used.
  • Minor corrections are noted by another participant, emphasizing that the overall expression was well done.
  • Participants discuss the technical content, including the voltage and current values mentioned in the tests, without reaching a consensus on the best phrasing or terminology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need for minor corrections and improvements in language, but there are varying opinions on specific terms and expressions used in the original text. No consensus is reached on the best phrasing for certain technical descriptions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of article usage and common phrasing in English, indicating that certain technical terms may not be universally accepted or understood.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for non-native English speakers seeking to improve their technical writing in scientific contexts, as well as for those interested in the intersection of language and technical communication.

Grz
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Hello everyone,

I have an unusual request. Since I am not a native speaker of English, would you be willing to check if I didn't write something infinitely stupid? Do you notice anything that sounds strange/out-of-place/not English at all? Any missed articles? I would be really grateful for every comment.HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATOR

The tent underwent high voltage tests with discharges produced by an impulse voltage generator. An electrode imitating a tourist's head had been placed in the tent. The estimated voltage depended on the distance between the tent and the end of the electrode and varied between 400 kv and 1MV.

CURRENT GENERATOR TEST

High current generator was used to check the tent's durability. A series of electrical discharges with different peak current values were directed at the top of the frame of poles.

TESTS RESULTS

Where the pole segments connected to each other scorches could be noticed, which means that those points experienced very high temperatures. That is explained by their relativly high resistance. The stakes, which laid freely on the laboratory floor furing the tests, melted to some extend. Again, it suggests high temperatures generated at those points during discharges. A dramatic temperature increase in the short period of time resulted in sparks, i.e. particles of hot aluminum. The generated peak current was comparable to that occurring in a lightning – statistically, it varies between 30 and 40 kA, though higher values (more than 200 kA ) have been also reported.

 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Grz said:
CURRENT GENERATOR TEST

High current generator was used to check the tent's durability. A series of electrical discharges with different peak current values were directed at the top of the frame of poles.

Should be "A high current generator..."
 
I think you did it very well. Scorches is OK, but "some scorching" is the more common way to say it.
 
Minor corrections in bold, none technical. It was very well expressed.

HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATOR

The tent underwent high voltage tests with discharges produced by an impulse voltage generator. An electrode imitating a tourist's head was placed in the tent. The estimated voltage depended on the distance between the tent and the end of the electrode and was varied between 400 kv and 1MV.

CURRENT GENERATOR TEST

A High current generator was used to check the tent's durability. A series of electrical discharges with different peak current values were directed at the top of the tent poles.

TESTS RESULTS

Where the pole segments connected to each other scorches could be noticed, which means that those points experienced very high temperatures. That is explained by their relatively high resistance. The tent stakes, which laid freely on the laboratory floor during the tests, melted to some extent. Again, it suggests high temperatures generated at those points during the discharges. A dramatic temperature increase in the short period of time resulted in sparks, i.e. particles of hot aluminum. The generated peak current was comparable to that occurring in a lightning strike. Statistically, lightning strikes vary between 30 and 40 kA, though higher values (more than 200 kA ) have been also reported.
 
Thank you, Dr. Courtney and anorlunda. And special thanks to you, meBigGuy. The fact that complete strangers are eager to help complete strangers never ceases to amaze me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Dr. Courtney

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 705 ·
24
Replies
705
Views
123K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K