Does it make sense to say that something is almost infinite?

  • B
  • Thread starter SSG-E
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Infinite
In summary: There is no formal definition for almost infinite, but informally it means a really large number likely a number you can't write down in a reasonable amount of time. For example, the largest known Smith number is (101031−1) × (104594 + 3×102297 + 1)1476 ×103913210. The largest known Mersenne prime is (as of December 21, 2018), googolplex = . Skewes' numbers: the first is approximately , the second , googolplexian = . Graham's number, larger than what can be represented even using power towers (tetration). However, it can be represented using Knuth's up-arrow notation. Ray
  • #1
SSG-E
60
12
TL;DR Summary
Does it make sense to say that something is almost infinite? If yes, then why?
I remember hearing someone say "almost infinite" in this video. As someone who hasn't studied very much math, "almost infinite" sounds like nonsense. Either something ends or it doesn't, there really isn't a spectrum of unending-ness. In this video he says that ''almost infinite'' pieces of verticle lines are placed along X length. Why not infinit?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No I'm not aware of any sense in which 'almost infinite' makes formal sense. In practise, I guess it means "a very large number".

From a context of ordinal numbers, the first infinite ordinal ##\omega## has no predecessor, that is there is no ordinal ##\eta## such that ##\omega = \eta +1##. One says that ##\omega## is a limit ordinal.
 
  • Like
Likes Adesh and etotheipi
  • #3
Math_QED said:
No I'm not aware of any sense in which 'almost infinite' makes sense.

From a context of ordinal numbers, the first infinite ordinal ##\omega## has no predecessor, that is there is no ordinal ##\eta## such that ##\omega = \eta +1##. One says that ##\omega## is a limit ordinal.
Then is it correct to say infinite pieces instead of almost infinite pieces in that video?
 
  • #4
SSG-E said:
Then is it correct to say infinite pieces instead of almost infinite pieces in that video?

I did not say something like that. This video tries to intuitively explain what dimension is. You shouldn't be looking for rigorous explanations in videos like that, but just to get a 'feeling' for the subject.

Infinite dimensional just means NOT finite dimensional (in the context of vector spaces at least).
 
  • #5
Math_QED said:
I did not say something like that. This video tries to intuitively explain what dimension is. You shouldn't be looking for rigorous explanations in videos like that, but just to get a 'feeling' for the subject.

Infinite dimensional just means NOT finite dimensional (in the context of vector spaces at least).
I don't get it
 
  • #6
Things are either finite or infinite. There is no formal definition for almost infinite. Informally as @Math_QED said it means a really large number likely a number you can't write down in a reasonable amount of time.

Some famous cases of numbers are:

  • googol =
    10^{{100}}.
  • centillion =
    10^{303}
    or
    10^{600}
    , depending on number naming system.
  • millillion =
    {\displaystyle 10^{3003}}
    or
    {\displaystyle 10^{6000}}
    , depending on number naming system.
  • micrillion =
    {\displaystyle 10^{3000003}}
    or
    {\displaystyle 10^{6000000}}
    , depending on number naming system.
  • The largest known Smith number = (101031−1) × (104594 + 3×102297 + 1)1476 ×103913210.
  • The largest known Mersenne prime =
    {\displaystyle 2^{82,589,933}-1}
    (as of December 21, 2018),
  • googolplex =
    10^{\text{googol}}=10^{10^{100}}
    .
  • Skewes' numbers: the first is approximately
    10^{10^{10^{34}}}
    , the second
    10^{10^{10^{964}}}
    ,
  • googolplexian =
    {\displaystyle 10^{\text{googolplex}}=10^{10^{\text{googol}}}=10^{10^{10^{100}}}}
    .
  • Graham's number, larger than what can be represented even using power towers (tetration). However, it can be represented using Knuth's up-arrow notation.
  • Rayo's number is a large number named after Agustín Rayo which has been claimed to be the largest named number. It was originally defined in a "big number duel" at MIT on 26 January 2007.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_numbers

It's like games of chance where people like to say they almost won. They either won or they lost there is nothing in between. You either won the money or lost the money but almost won sounds better especially when talking to your spouse.
 
  • Like
Likes Adesh, etotheipi, SSG-E and 1 other person
  • #7
One could come up with a topological notion of "almost infinite". Consider, for instance the real number line compactified into a circle by adjoining a point at +/- infinity. Impose a topology on this circle by considering that the distance (metric) between a point x and infinity is given by ##\frac{1}{\text{max}(1,|x|)}##

[I suspect one might have to juice up this metric a bit to make sure it obeys the triangle inequality. The easy way is to use the induced metric from the circle. Now all you have to do is map real values plus infinity to a circle -- something like arc-tangent]

Now you have a notion of "almost infinite" -- 1,000,000 is only 1/1,000,000 away from infinity.
 
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi
  • #8
jbriggs444 said:
Consider, for instance the real number line compactified into a circle by adjoining a point at +/- infinity
Or even map all complex numbers onto a sphere (the Riemann sphere):
1591811906765.png
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog and etotheipi

1. What does it mean for something to be "almost infinite"?

When something is described as "almost infinite," it means that it is very large or endless, but not quite infinite. It is a way of expressing that something is extremely large or vast, but still has a limit or endpoint.

2. Can something truly be almost infinite?

No, by definition, something that is infinite has no limit or endpoint. Therefore, something cannot be "almost infinite" in the strictest sense. However, the term can be used as an expression to describe something that is very large or seemingly endless.

3. How is "almost infinite" different from "infinite"?

The main difference between "almost infinite" and "infinite" is that "almost infinite" implies that there is still a limit or endpoint, while "infinite" means there is no limit or endpoint. "Almost infinite" is a relative term, while "infinite" is an absolute concept.

4. Is it scientifically accurate to use the term "almost infinite"?

The term "almost infinite" is not a scientifically accurate term, as it is not a precise measurement or concept. However, it can be used in a descriptive or comparative sense to convey a sense of vastness or magnitude.

5. How is the concept of "almost infinite" relevant in science?

The concept of "almost infinite" can be relevant in certain scientific fields, such as astronomy or physics, where extremely large or endless quantities are often discussed. It can also be used in mathematical or theoretical discussions to describe numbers or concepts that are very large, but not truly infinite.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
5
Views
880
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • General Math
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top