Does light reach every single part of space?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcgrissz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether light reaches every part of space, exploring concepts related to the emission of photons, their propagation, and the nature of light as both particles and waves. Participants examine the implications of light intensity, distance from sources, and the probabilistic nature of photon detection.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that photons emitted from circular objects may not reach every part of space due to the angles at which they are emitted.
  • Others argue that light from a point source travels in all directions, forming a sphere, and thus can reach all areas, albeit with decreasing intensity over distance.
  • A participant suggests that the probability of detecting photons decreases with distance, but this probability exists at every point in space at the same distance from the source.
  • Some participants express confusion about the concept of "gaps" in light, with one asserting that while there are gaps in where photons are measured, there are no gaps in the wavefunction itself.
  • Another participant mentions that the intensity of light diminishes with distance, leading to fewer photons reaching distant objects, which could imply the existence of gaps in practical terms.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between the distance traveled by waves and the probability of finding a photon, with a participant noting that this relationship resembles the inverse square law.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether there are gaps in the propagation of light and the implications of photon detection probabilities. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the nature of light and its reach in space.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference previous discussions on similar topics, indicating that the concepts of photon density and gaps in light may require further exploration and clarification. The discussion also highlights the complexity of understanding light's behavior in terms of both classical and quantum mechanics.

marcgrissz
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
We all know that light is photons (massless particles) traveling in waves in straight lines. My doubt is: photons are emitted by circular objects, which means that there are some angles between waves, which means that photons don't reach every single part of the space...
 
Science news on Phys.org
I really have no idea what you mean by "angles between waves" or why you think that means "photons don't reach every single part of space"?
 
HallsofIvy said:
I really have no idea what you mean by "angles between waves" or why you think that means "photons don't reach every single part of space"?
Ok sorry, maybe i wasn' t so clear...
Photons are emitted by round objects and travel through a straight line; there must be a distance of space between those lines and since they come from a round object there bust be a part of space where light doesn't arrive. I linked an image just for rendering the concept.

http://www.school-for-champions.com/science/images/electric_charge_field_lines.gif
 
A light wave from a point source travels in a circle (actually, in 3 dimensions, a sphere) centered on the point. The lines you show are only a few of the infinite number of radii of such a circle (or sphere).
 
HallsofIvy said:
A light wave from a point source travels in a circle (actually, in 3 dimensions, a sphere) centered on the point. of radii of such a circle (or sphere).
I know that but an object which is light-years far from the one emitting the photons, may doesn't receive any of them!
 
Photons can be understood as particles, but also they can be understood as waves, (in an electromagnetic field).
If you throw a rock into a pond it produces waves.
The waves spread out until they are too small to be seen, but they spread in a continuous, and even way, no gaps where the wave is absent.
 
rootone said:
Photons can be understood as particles, but also they can be understood as waves, (in an electromagnetic field).
If you throw a rock into a pond it produces waves.
The waves spread out until they are too small to be seen, but they spread in a continuous, and even way, no gaps where the wave is absent.
Interesting answare! But i still don't understand how a finite number of waves spreading out from a round object can reach every single part of space...
 
For most light sources, the intensity drops off with distance, because the light energy is spread out over a larger area. You are correct that an object far from the source may not receive any photons from the source, because as the intensity drops, the rate of photons drops, and the probability of getting a photon is lower. The actual number of photons hitting the target is random. This has nothing to do with spaces between angles since angles are dense and have no spaces between them, and simply has to do with probability.
 
It's not intuitive how light works. At your level, you will simply have to accept that light travels as a wave which is infinitely divisible, but the wave only have a certain probability of interacting with a target, and only in clumps of energy and momentum, which we refer to as photons. If you are looking for an intuitive description, you won't find one.
 
  • #10
Khashishi said:
It's not intuitive how light works. At your level, you will simply have to accept that light travels as a wave which is infinitely divisible, but the wave only have a certain probability of interacting with a target, and only in clumps of energy and momentum, which we refer to as photons. If you are looking for an intuitive description, you won't find one.
Thanks for answering. You know, I love physics because is all logic and I think it is all related to logic and intuitive stuff... Anyway, do you have any official source where I can read what you said? Like a book or something else...
 
  • #11
We had almost exactly the same thread a few months ago. You may find some of the answers on how dense the barrage of photons we are receiving is and how small the "gaps", if they can still be called "gaps" when they are so small, are:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-there-gaps-between-the-rays-coming-from-the-sun.803656/

There are objects in space that we can take pictures of (using the Hubble Space Telescope) that are so dim and far away that a big telescope only captures a few photons per second from them, so you might say there are "gaps" between the rays from such objects. But those objects are on the other side of the visible universe from us. There is nowhere in the universe far enough away from galaxies that it isn't awash with light.
 
  • #12
so you might say there are "gaps" between the rays from such objects. But those objects are on the other side of the visible universe from us. There is nowhere in the universe far enough away from galaxies that it isn't awash with light.[/QUOTE said:
But that means that: Yes! There are Gaps! I read the other article and I realized how dense they are, but it doesn't mean there are no gaps...
 
  • #13
There aren't gaps in the wavefunction. There are just gaps in where the photons actually happen to be measured. Do you know what a wavefunction is? In other words, the photon has a probability of being emitted in any direction, with no gaps, but the actual photon is emitted in one direction randomly, so yeah there are gaps, but it has nothing to do with gaps in angles.
 
  • #14
Khashishi said:
There aren't gaps in the wavefunction. There are just gaps in where the photons actually happen to be measured. Do you know what a wavefunction is? In other words, the photon has a probability of being emitted in any direction, with no gaps, but the actual photon is emitted in one direction randomly, so yeah there are gaps, but it has nothing to do with gaps in angles.
Thanks for answering, but I don't really understand what you mean... You said that there are no gaps in the wavefunction, but we know that each photon travels in a wave and you said that they fallow "random" directions, but that means that between a wave and another there is a gap!
 
  • #15
Yeah, you kinda need to study quantum mechanics for a while. It's not easy to explain.
 
  • #16
Khashishi said:
Yeah, you kinda need to study quantum mechanics for a while. It's not easy to explain.
Try, please. I don't think there is any kind of physics not-understandable by human logic...
 
  • #17
As we get further from the light source, the probabiltiy of actually detecting a photon becomes less.
However that probability exists to the same degree at every point in space that is the same distance from the source.
There are no point in space where the probability is zero, hence the wave is everywhere, regardless of where a photon was actually seen,
Over time and averaged out, every point of space at the same distance from source will 'see' photons at a rate consistent with the probability of seeing photons at that distance.
 
  • #18
rootone said:
As we get further from the light source, the probabiltiy of actually detecting a photon becomes less.
However that probability exists to the same degree at every point in space that is the same distance from the source.
There are no point in space where the probability is zero, hence the wave is everywhere, regardless of where a photon was actually seen,
Over time and averaged out, every point of space at the same distance from source will 'see' photons at a rate consistent with the probability of seeing photons at that distance.
Ok I think I got what you said. That means that all the waves we use (like radio waves for example) travel in all directions just like mechanical waves in water?
 
  • #19
Yeah.
 
  • #20
Ok thanks, Does anybody know the equation that relates the distance traveled by the waves to the probability of finding a photon at that point?
 
  • #21
It goes essentially as 1/r^2.
 
  • #22
Khashishi said:
It goes essentially as 1/r^2.
wow... just like the gravity force. I there any k?
 
  • #23
marcgrissz said:
But that means that: Yes! There are Gaps! I read the other article and I realized how dense they are, but it doesn't mean there are no gaps...
If they overlap, would you still say there are gaps?
 
  • #24
marcgrissz said:
wow... just like the gravity force. I there any k?
No K: this is just a basic function of the geometry in your first picture. The difference in surface area of two circles with different radii.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 207 ·
7
Replies
207
Views
14K