B Does Light Speed Affect Mass of Surrounding Objects?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter hsdrop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Point
hsdrop
Messages
324
Reaction score
114
I know that when anything starts moving close to the speed of C (light speed) it ganes mass from an outside perspective. Does the same apply in the reverse? From the perspective of the thing that moving close to C does everything around it lose mass??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hsdrop said:
when anything starts moving close to the speed of C (light speed) it ganes mass from an outside perspective

This concept of "relativistic mass" is actually not considered very useful in modern relativity. The modern view focuses on rest mass, better thought of as invariant mass since it is invariant under a change of reference frame.

hsdrop said:
From the perspective of the thing that moving close to C does everything around it lose mass??

If you are using the concept of relativistic mass, then from the perspective of the thing, everything around it is moving close to the speed of light (while it itself is at rest), and therefore the relativistic mass of everything around it is increased.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Ok that makes sense, I just was not sure how to think of it.
If you don't mind, I would like to ask another quick question.
Do object traveling close to C true get thinner or is it just the way the light bounces off it at that speed?:oldconfused:
 
hsdrop said:
Do object traveling close to C true get thinner

If you're referring to length contraction, if you measure the length of an object traveling at close to c relative to you, it will be shorter in its direction of motion than it would be if it were at rest relative to you.
 
Thank you peter for taking the time to answer my questions and phrasing it in such a way that everyone can understand no matter what level of education they might have.
:partytime::wink:
 
  • Like
Likes nitsuj
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top