Does Observation Influence Reality in Quantum Physics?

alex.cordero
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if this is the right forum for my question so here it goes. If not, let me know and I'll be happy to move on.

I've been reading information written by Fred A. Wolf and J. Sarfatti and I think that I'm getting carried away with how I'm interpreting their information. According to what F.A. Wolf writes, you can simply visualize a particle or a wave, or both and your observation determines what it becomes. Of course this has many implications in both philosophy and theology.

I'm not a scientist so my emphasis is in philosophy. But I need a healthy, pragmatic and realistic way to interpret what they're saying so that I don't get carried away and give rise to pseudoscience.

How do you migrate the seemingly phantom world or quantum physics and consensus reality?

Thanks,

-Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
54
Views
10K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top