Does Parity Checking Have Any Real Value in Error Detection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter frenzal_dude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parity
AI Thread Summary
Parity checking is a valuable error detection method despite its limitation in detecting even numbers of errors. It is particularly effective in clean communication channels where single-bit errors are rare, allowing for quick retransmission requests. While it may not catch all errors, it can help pinpoint corrupted data, making corrections easier. Parity checking is often used alongside other techniques, such as checksums, to enhance reliability. Overall, it remains a simple and efficient tool in the broader context of data transmission error detection.
frenzal_dude
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
I don't understand how parity error detection is any use since if there are an even number of mistakes, the errors won't be detected.

If there's more to it than this please let me know.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes its useful. Its used everywhere sometimes on individual characters being transmitted. It works best if you have a very clean comm channel and single bit fails occur rarely. Detection means the receiver can request a retransmission of the character. If the line degrades a lot then you'll get a lot of parity checks in a transmission then you can terminate the transmission (even though you may have missed the even bit errors) forcing the transmittor to send everything again.

For more comprehensive error checking and repair, other schemes will be used with the attendant hardware/software complexity that goes with them.
 
Wow.

Back in the days of teletype machines and punched paper tape,

parity check could tell you quickly if an individual character(byte) was corrrupted.

That was handy because you could stop partway through a file load and reload the tape. Also it gave you a clue where in the tape to look for your trouble. Teletype machines read about ten bytes/second, and a high speed reader could do aout 400. Obviously we didn't do multi-megabyte files on paper tape.

Usually a "Checksum" on the whole file was done at end of read, which will detect an even # of bit errors. That was deadly - you didn't know where to look.

I liked paper tape - a corrupted file you could hold up to the light and see every bit. With Scotch tape and a pocket knife one could fix a corrupt file.

But back then 32K was a lot of memory.

old jim
 
If you just talking about single parity check, you catch 50% only. But you don't just use one time, like Jim said, you have check sum and other check at the same time. So if the data pass all the check, it is quite reliable...notice "quite"? Nothing is absolute.
 


Parity checking is a useful method for detecting errors in transmitted data. While it is true that an even number of errors may not be detected, parity checking is still valuable because it can detect the majority of errors that occur during data transmission. In addition, parity checking can help identify the location of the error, making it easier to correct. Furthermore, parity checking is a simple and efficient method that does not require a lot of additional resources. It is just one of many error detection techniques that scientists and engineers use to ensure the accuracy and reliability of data transmission.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top