Does Pauli's Exclusion Principle Prevent Atoms from Coexisting in Stars?

Strang3r
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does the exclusion principle mean that no atom and sub atomic particles can exist at the same place?

Can I safely say that in stars the gravity is opposed by this aspect or implication of the principle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Strang3r said:
Does the exclusion principle mean that no atom and sub atomic particles can exist at the same place?
it only applies to Fermions, e.g., electrons. No two electrons can occupy the same orbital state. More generally the many-body wavefunction of a system of electrons must be anti-symmetric with respect to interchange of any two electrons.
Can I safely say that in stars the gravity is opposed by this aspect or implication of the principle?
there can be a degeneracy pressure, e.g., in neutron stars (neutrons are fermions), that opposes gravitational collapse.
 
Oh, also... Welcome to Physics Forums.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top