Does Potential Energy Always Decrease with Conservative Force?

AI Thread Summary
Potential energy does not always decrease in the direction of a conservative force. It is defined as the negative work done by the conservative force, meaning that when displacement is in the direction of the force, the potential energy difference is negative. However, in cases like an inverse square force, potential energy can increase in the direction of the force, as illustrated by the equation U = -A/r + c. This highlights that the relationship between potential energy and conservative forces can vary depending on the specific force involved. Understanding these nuances is crucial for analyzing energy changes in physical systems.
pratikaman
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
is it true that potential energy of a particle always decreases in the direction of conservative force acting on it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi pratikaman! :smile:
pratikaman said:
is it true that potential energy of a particle always decreases in the direction of conservative force acting on it.

potential energy is defined as minus the work done by a conservative force

so yes, if your displacement is in the direction of the force, the work done is positive, and so the potential energy difference is negative :wink:
 
ok take a inverse square force like A/r^2 always pointing towards origin. where 'A' is some constant and 'r' is distance from origin of force. then potential energy function for this is U= A/r + c . where c is arbitrary constant. then potential in this case increases in direction of force.
 
no, U= -A/r + c :wink:
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Conservative forces, Nonconservative forces and Potential Energy
Replies
9
Views
3K
Gravitational potential energy -- Why is it always negative?
Replies
10
Views
3K
Question about potential energy: gravity and a vertical spring
Replies
12
Views
4K
I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Can energy be decomposed?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I How to interpret this definition of potential energy?
Replies
10
Views
2K
"External" potential energies strike back
Replies
6
Views
1K
Why the change in potential energy is the same in all cases?
Replies
22
Views
2K
Internal forces converting kinetic into potential energy (vice versa)
Replies
10
Views
2K
Potential Energy: Rigorous Understanding & E=mc²
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top