Does Shaking Harder Create More Charge in a Faraday Flashlight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tweaked9107
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Faraday
AI Thread Summary
Shaking a Faraday flashlight generates electrical charge by moving a magnet through a coil, with both the speed of the magnet and the number of passes contributing to the charge produced. The key factor in generating more charge is the number of turns in the coil rather than its length. A single pass through a longer coil can produce similar charge as multiple passes through a shorter coil, assuming the turn density remains constant. The process can be likened to converting gravitational potential energy into electrical energy. Overall, increasing the number of passes and the coil's turns enhances the electrical output.
Tweaked9107
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
So I have a very basic question, but I have next to no electrical understanding so can't answer it myself.

With a Faraday torch you shake a magnet in a coil to create electrical charge. They say the harder you shake the more charge you create, so my question is this... is it the increased number of passes the magnet makes through the coil that would create more charge, or is it the speed of the magnet passing through the coil that creates more charge?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Its a bit of both - but basically (mostly) each pass of the magnet moves a set amount of charge from one place to another. It's like pumping water.
Note: no charge is created or destroyed in this process.
 
Thanks for the reply.

So do you think a single pass through a 1m long coil could produce the same amount as multiple passes through a 0.1m long coil?
 
Tweaked9107 said:
Thanks for the reply.

So do you think a single pass through a 1m long coil could produce the same amount as multiple passes through a 0.1m long coil?

The number of turns, not the length is the key parameter. There are complexities such as leakage flux, but in a rough sense yes. The number of passes times the number of turns should be roughly proportional to the amount of charge.
 
You can imagine if you just inverted the coil+magnet, allowing the magnet to fall - then the setup converts a proportion of the gravitational potential energy into electrical energy stored in a battery. Twice the coil length (all else i.e. the turn density remaining equal) gets you twice the GPE ans so twice the electrical energy.
This would be the same if you just shook it horizontally - bearing in mind you'll also need twice the effort.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top