Does Shaking Harder Create More Charge in a Faraday Flashlight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tweaked9107
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Faraday
AI Thread Summary
Shaking a Faraday flashlight generates electrical charge by moving a magnet through a coil, with both the speed of the magnet and the number of passes contributing to the charge produced. The key factor in generating more charge is the number of turns in the coil rather than its length. A single pass through a longer coil can produce similar charge as multiple passes through a shorter coil, assuming the turn density remains constant. The process can be likened to converting gravitational potential energy into electrical energy. Overall, increasing the number of passes and the coil's turns enhances the electrical output.
Tweaked9107
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
So I have a very basic question, but I have next to no electrical understanding so can't answer it myself.

With a Faraday torch you shake a magnet in a coil to create electrical charge. They say the harder you shake the more charge you create, so my question is this... is it the increased number of passes the magnet makes through the coil that would create more charge, or is it the speed of the magnet passing through the coil that creates more charge?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Its a bit of both - but basically (mostly) each pass of the magnet moves a set amount of charge from one place to another. It's like pumping water.
Note: no charge is created or destroyed in this process.
 
Thanks for the reply.

So do you think a single pass through a 1m long coil could produce the same amount as multiple passes through a 0.1m long coil?
 
Tweaked9107 said:
Thanks for the reply.

So do you think a single pass through a 1m long coil could produce the same amount as multiple passes through a 0.1m long coil?

The number of turns, not the length is the key parameter. There are complexities such as leakage flux, but in a rough sense yes. The number of passes times the number of turns should be roughly proportional to the amount of charge.
 
You can imagine if you just inverted the coil+magnet, allowing the magnet to fall - then the setup converts a proportion of the gravitational potential energy into electrical energy stored in a battery. Twice the coil length (all else i.e. the turn density remaining equal) gets you twice the GPE ans so twice the electrical energy.
This would be the same if you just shook it horizontally - bearing in mind you'll also need twice the effort.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top