Does space expansion theory obey relativity laws?

azzkika
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Does space expansion theory obey relativity laws??

I've been wondering about the idea of space expansion that's been used to explain red shift effects in most of our universe, which forgive me if i am wrong is nothing(space) propelling matter.

Please could someone tell me if i am misunderstanding space expansion and give a correct explanation of it for me.

Or if i have understood it correctly, surely it goes against relativistic principals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What you call space expansion, which I find an inaccurate and confusing phrase, is in full agreement with general relativity. And in the absence of a cosmological constant it is also locally in agreement with special relativity.
 


I think the really inaccurate phrase is "propelling". Azzikika, you shouldn't think of it as space moving matter. It's more accurate to think of it as matter staying in the same place (at approximately constant spatial coordinates) while space grows. I'm not sure why Jennifer doesn't like the term "space expansion", but I'm guessing that it has something to do with the fact that GR is a theory about spacetime, not space, and spacetime doesn't change. It just "is".
 


Fredrik said:
I think the really inaccurate phrase is "propelling". Azzikika, you shouldn't think of it as space moving matter. It's more accurate to think of it as matter staying in the same place (at approximately constant spatial coordinates) while space grows. I'm not sure why Jennifer doesn't like the term "space expansion", but I'm guessing that it has something to do with the fact that GR is a theory about spacetime, not space, and spacetime doesn't change. It just "is".


but if 'space grows', as it were, then 2 separate objects are moving relative to each other in this process, with no causal force. i personally cannot get my head around this concept.

i probably need to learn a lot more, but for now i choose to believe the motion is caused by a substantive force, probably massive external gravity beyond our current horizons. i think space expansion is a result, not a cause of whatever is occurring in our universe.

i also thought that gravity distorts space time, thus it isn't constant.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top