Does speed vary with a circle's radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike427
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the speed and behavior of LEDs in a spinning display, where the user initially observed that center LEDs appeared to spin faster than those on the outside. It was clarified that while all LEDs share the same angular velocity, the outer LEDs have a higher linear velocity due to their greater radius. The transformation of the intended letter "H" into an "A" was attributed to the need for precise timing in activating the LEDs at different points in the rotation, rather than any speed differentiation. The final solution involved standing the LEDs vertically to create a hologram effect, which resolved the initial issue. Understanding the relationship between angular and linear velocity is crucial for achieving the desired visual output in such displays.
mike427
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

I am not physics major and I haven't had a physics class in sometime, but for my senior project I made a spinning LED display. The original design we had was flat and had an array of leds that blinked on and off fast while the motor spun.

spin1.png


However, when it started to spin and we programmed the letter H, where all of the leds would blink on, then the center would only be on, and the all of them would be lite again we ran into a problem. Here is what it was suppose to look like:

spin3.png


The problem was that it seemed that the center LEDs were somehow spinning faster in the center than the ones on the outside compared to the LEDs on the inside. Basically, instead of an H we got an A:

problem.png


We ended up standing the LEDs up vertically to create a hologram effect in the end. In addition, having them aligned vertically the same distance from the circle removed that problem.

I recently started discussing my previous dilemma with a friend and I said that the LEDs must have spun faster in the center of the circle. However, he though that the outside would be spinning faster since it covered more distance. Furthermore, we also thought that they should be spinning at the same speed.

So, basically, how does the speed, velocity, or generally any term you want to call it vary to create this effect we saw on the spinning LED display?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.

The outer LEDs have a higher linear velocity. All the LEDs have the same angular velocity. The linear velocity V is related to the angular velocity omega by this:

V = R * \omega

Where omega is the angular velocity in radians per second, and R is the radius out to the LED. There are 2*PI radians in a full circle.

As to why your H turned into an A, draw a diagram of concentric circles that show where the LEDs are, and then overlay the H that you want to spell out. Do you see now that you need to turn on different LEDs at different parts of the rotation to trace out the straight lines of the H? (especially the two side legs)
 
Thanks for the response. So basically, its because of the way the circle naturally expands out with two lines out from the center? It was not due to any sort of speed or velocity differentiation?
 
mike427 said:
Thanks for the response. So basically, its because of the way the circle naturally expands out with two lines out from the center? It was not due to any sort of speed or velocity differentiation?

Correct. As long as the rotation frequency is faster than the "flicker fusion frequency" of the human eye, the image will appear steady. The trick is to overlay your letter on the concentric circles to figure out what LEDs need to be on at what times (at what angles of the rotating rod).
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top