Does stirring water help bring it to boil faster?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AHVincent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boil Water
AI Thread Summary
Stirring water in a large pot may enhance heat transfer by promoting forced convection, potentially bringing it to a boil faster. However, natural convection is likely sufficient for mixing, suggesting minimal difference in boiling time. An experiment could clarify the impact of stirring, as it may slightly contribute to heating but also risk increased heat loss. Additionally, stirring could require removing the pot cover, which may negate any benefits. Overall, letting the pot sit undisturbed might be the most efficient approach.
AHVincent
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Is it faster to leave the pot alone until it boils or to stir it every few minutes to increase convection?

This is for a very large pot of over 50 litres using a 50 000 BTU commercial gaz burner at full power.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would expect faster heat transfer from flame to water when the temperature difference is high. So stirring the water (forced convection) will keep water with lower temperature in contact with the walls of the pan and should ensure more heat goes into the water and less is wasted into the surrounding air.
 
My guess is that natural convection will mix it reasonably well in the first place, so there won't be much of a difference. You could always try it as an experiment (all you need is a stopwatch), and let us know the results...
 
And weren't Joule's experiments done by stirring a fluid? Ideally the heat generated by stirring the pot would be added to the heat from the element, I know it would be very small, but that would also shorten the time to boiling.
 
The stirring element might take some of the heat from the water. Waves caused by the stirring might also increase heat loss...and ultimately, you probably have to take the cover off to stir it.

I say just let it be.
 
  • Like
Likes Ravi Singh choudhary
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top