Does symptomatic relief slow recovery?

  • Thread starter Thread starter matthyaouw
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Medicines that relieve symptoms of diseases may potentially slow recovery, as many symptoms are part of the body's natural defense mechanisms against pathogens. For instance, fever can inhibit bacterial growth, while vomiting and diarrhea help expel harmful bacteria. However, excessive symptoms can be detrimental, leading to discomfort or health risks, which justifies the use of medications in certain situations. Pain serves as a warning sign, and using painkillers may lead to over-exertion, hindering recovery. The appropriateness of symptom relief depends on the disease's cause and specific symptoms. For bacterial infections like E. coli, treating symptoms such as diarrhea is often discouraged, as it can impede the body's ability to eliminate the bacteria. The discussion also touches on common illnesses like colds and low-grade fevers, indicating a need for further exploration of symptom management in these cases.
matthyaouw
Gold Member
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
5
I've been wondering, do medicines that relieve the symptoms of a disease slow your recovery from it? It's been my understanding that many symptoms arise as a side effect of your body's attampts to remove a pathogen, for example altering temperature to inhibit bacterial growth, or inducing vomiting/the sh**ts to get rid of bacteria in the digestive tract. Would that mean that taking medication to get rid of these symptoms is actually detrimental in the long run, or have I misunderstood something?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Too much of something good can be bad. If your temperature raised too high, it's bad for you so you should relieve the symptom. If you are vomiting all the time, you won't be happy either. You should first let your body take care of itself, if it starts to bother you too much you can relieve the symptoms.

Another thing to take note of, is that pain is also a warning sign of your body to slow down. If you start taking pain killers you can definitely slow recovery due to over-exertion.
 
matthyaouw said:
I've been wondering, do medicines that relieve the symptoms of a disease slow your recovery from it? It's been my understanding that many symptoms arise as a side effect of your body's attampts to remove a pathogen, for example altering temperature to inhibit bacterial growth, or inducing vomiting/the sh**ts to get rid of bacteria in the digestive tract. Would that mean that taking medication to get rid of these symptoms is actually detrimental in the long run, or have I misunderstood something?

It depends on the cause of disease and on the symptoms...
 
That makes sense, thanks. :smile:
 
I know that for many bacterial infections that cause diarrhea such as E. coli, treatment of this symptom is not recommended because it impedes the bodies ability to expel the bacteria. In the case of Clostridium difficile infection it can even increase the liklihood of dangerous complications.

I'm curious myself about more common things like colds and low to mid-range fevers.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top