Does the distance affect the landing of a bouncing die?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 111111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the distance a die is dropped affects its landing position and side. It highlights that while a perfectly controlled drop could yield consistent results, factors like air motion and surface imperfections introduce variability. Quantum mechanics is mentioned, but it's clarified that its effects are negligible at the scale of a die or BB. The conversation suggests that larger objects like cubic dice are less susceptible to randomness compared to smaller ones. Ultimately, the distance of the drop does influence the outcome due to the amplification of imperfections, but this is not directly related to quantum mechanics.
111111
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Lets say you have a die and a galton board (a vertical array of pegs used to demonstrate the normal distribution), you build some kind of apparatus that will allow you to drop the die from the exact location, with the exact degree of tilt, ect, repeatedly. You also have a super slow motion camera to capture its decent.

Question: Will the die follow the exact path each time, and land on the same side? I have heard that quantum mechanics says that the die would only have probabilities of where it would land.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's more chaos theory, how accurately can you drop it at exactly the same angle in the same point. Then you have to worry about air motion, then the thermal motion of atoms on the surface of the die and the pegs.
 
Yeah. Quantum effects are not going to manifest themselves very readily in your situation. the more exact you build the dropper, board and what not, the more consistant your die drop will be. If you use something as large as a cubic die, you can ensure that you get the same value. Something smaller like a BB would get you more random results.
 
Jakell said:
If you use something as large as a cubic die, you can ensure that you get the same value. Something smaller like a BB would get you more random results.

So would a BB actually be affected by quantum mechanics? I am just wondering if quantum mechanics theoretically happens on the scale of inches, feet, miles, ect, or if it is only something that occurs at the level of photons, electrons, ect.
 
I would have though that the distane in which the die is dropped would have an effect, as the further it is dropped the greater any imperfection will be exagerated, this is the same as with the size of the bases of the die. This itself I do not think is in any way related to Quantum mechanics but I think it still apllies.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top