Does the Interval [-1,∞) Include Any Open Sets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zli034
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
zli034
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
On the number line R, does [-1,\infty) contain an open set?

because it includes -1, don't think it is an open set.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zli034 said:
On the number line R, does [-1,\infty) contain an open set?

because it includes -1, don't think it is an open set.

It's a half open interval that you've shown. If you define a set {[-1,\infty)} then it contains at least one half open subset.
 
Last edited:
Is the question: Is [-1, \infty) an open set?

Or is the question: Does [-1, \infty) contain an open set?
 
Office_Shredder said:
Is the question: Is [-1, \infty) an open set?

Or is the question: Does [-1, \infty) contain an open set?

What's the difference?
 
It is not an open set. But it contains the open set (4, 7) for example.
 
g_edgar said:
It is not an open set. But it contains the open set (4, 7) for example.
I guess I'm not understanding the OP's question. Any non zero interval on the reals "contains" every possible combination: [a,b],(a,b),(a,b],[a,b). Any such interval has a bijective mapping to the entire set of reals, so of course the interval [-1,\infty) "contains" open sets.

EDIT: Perhaps I'm mistaken, but in terms of open and closed sets or subsets, I'm considering the actual membership of a given set to be dependent on the specification (choice) of that set. Therefore I could specify that every subset of C:C subset of R be closed.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top