Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Does the inverse square rule work with a magnetic field?

  1. Jul 12, 2016 #1
    I am interested in mini magnetospheres. How do i calculate the intensity of the field at a certain distance if i already know theits intensity at the source?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 12, 2016 #2
    An elemental current element produces a magnetic field that obeys the inverse square law. However real magnetic fields produced by a concatenation current elements or modeled as such result in fields that do not obey the ISL. In fact magnetic fields are produced by dipoles which have an inverse cube dependence for example a current in a loop of wire. These dipole fields also have an angular dependence with respect to the axis of symmetry of the dipole. For extensive sources the dependences can be more complex.
     
  4. Jul 12, 2016 #3

    Drakkith

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    What is an elemental current element?

    Calculating the strength of a magnetic field from a real source is not trivial. Many people simply end up measuring it instead of calculating it. As gleem said, the strength of the field is not simply a function of distance, but also of direction (strength at distance R from a pole is different than at distance R from the side). So there's not really a simple equation that will tell you the strength at a particular distance.
     
  5. Jul 13, 2016 #4

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    The leading-order multipole expansion of the magnetic field is the dipole field which goes like ##1/r^3## for ##r \rightarrow \infty##.
     
  6. Jul 13, 2016 #5

    robphy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

  7. Jul 13, 2016 #6
    Thank you very much for the answers
     
  8. Jul 13, 2016 #7
    by the way it is a good task to integrate the problem of planar motion of a particle in the gravity field of the dipole and describe the motion of the particle
     
  9. Jul 19, 2016 #8
    totally agree.....use the lagrangian transformation
     
  10. Jul 19, 2016 #9
    did not understand your suggestion
     
  11. Jul 21, 2016 #10
    Actually this problem is integrated as follows. In suitable polar coordinates the Hamiltonian is
    $$H=\frac{1}{2m}\Big(p^2_r+\frac{p^2_\varphi}{r^2}\Big)+\frac{k\cos\varphi}{r^2}.$$
    It is easy to see that the variables are separated:
    $$H=\frac{p^2_r}{2m}+\frac{1}{2r^2}F;$$
    here ##F=p^2_\varphi/m+2k\cos\varphi## is a first integral: ##\{F,H\}=0##
     
  12. Jul 21, 2016 #11
    Hamiltonian....of course....sorry
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Does the inverse square rule work with a magnetic field?
Loading...