Does the Logarithm Correction Resolve the Gibbs Paradox?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Gibbs paradox and proposes that it can be resolved by applying the Gibbs correction to the logarithm of the partition function (Z) instead of Z itself. The suggested formula incorporates the number of identical particles in each class, allowing for a unified expression for various gas mixtures. This approach claims to generalize the treatment of different gases, identical gases with varying densities, and identical gases with the same density. However, a counterpoint is raised regarding the validity of summing the logarithms of each term in the partition function. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of the mathematical treatment of partition functions in statistical mechanics.
nucleartear
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
What I have not seen in books about the Gibbs paradox is that it doesn't exist if we make the Gibbs correction at the logarithm of the Z function, not at the Z function itself, in that way:

\ln Z_{i} - \ln N_{i} !

where N_{i} is the number of identical particles of class i, where there are a total of p classes.

With this definition of the correction, we can generalize the three cases of gas mixture (diferent gases, identical gases with different density and identical gases with identical density) in one expresion!:

F = - k_{B} T \sum_{i=1}^{p} \Left( \ln Z_{i} - \ln N_{i} ! \Right)

You could say that it's the same but... I think it's not the same! :smile:

If you find some error, please, let me know!

Thanx!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
nucleartear said:
F = - k_{B} T \sum_{i=1}^{p} \Left( \ln Z_{i} - \ln N_{i} ! \Right)

That's fine except that generally you can't simply sum over the logarithm of each term of the partition function.

Matt
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top