Does the presence of a sound box affect the duration of a tuning fork's sound?

AI Thread Summary
The presence of a sound box affects the duration of a tuning fork's sound by facilitating quicker energy transfer to the air, resulting in a shorter sound duration compared to the tuning fork alone. This occurs because the sound box dampens the vibrations of the tuning fork while also increasing the contact area with air, enhancing energy transfer. The discussion clarifies that both resonance and damping involve energy transfer, but the outcome differs based on how the energy is dissipated or transmitted. Ultimately, the sound box acts as a resonator that accelerates the loss of sound energy. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping concepts of resonance and damping in sound production.
mystreet123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was doing a question about resonance of sound box connecting to a tuning fork. It asks why the sound lasts for a shorter time with sound box than if the tuning fork is struck identically without the sound box.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is it because the sound box dampens the vibration of tuning fork, or because due to larger contact area of box with air the box transfers vibrational energy at higher rate to air, or these two reasons are actually the same thing? So does it mean that resonator will always dampen the driving oscillator? I'm quite confused between the idea of energy transfer in resonance and damping. Thanks in advance:)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mystreet123 said:

Homework Statement


I was doing a question about resonance of sound box connecting to a tuning fork. It asks why the sound lasts for a shorter time with sound box than if the tuning fork is struck identically without the sound box.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Is it because the sound box dampens the vibration of tuning fork, or because due to larger contact area of box with air the box transfers vibrational energy at higher rate to air, or these two reasons are actually the same thing? So does it mean that resonator will always dampen the driving oscillator? I'm quite confused between the idea of energy transfer in resonance and damping. Thanks in advance:)
You are right that, to the energy source, there is no distinction between resonance and damping. Either way, it is a transfer of energy from the energy source to whatever is in contact with it. The difference arises after that, being a matter of whether the energy is merely dissipated within the contacting matter (damping) or transferred on.
 
  • Like
Likes mystreet123
haruspex said:
You are right that, to the energy source, there is no distinction between resonance and damping. Either way, it is a transfer of energy from the energy source to whatever is in contact with it. The difference arises after that, being a matter of whether the energy is merely dissipated within the contacting matter (damping) or transferred on.
Thanks for replying!
So the reason for shorter sound note is due to resonance? as the energy is transferred on from sound box to air as sound energy more quickly than the tuning fork alone?
 
mystreet123 said:
Thanks for replying!
So the reason for shorter sound note is due to resonance? as the energy is transferred on from sound box to air as sound energy more quickly than the tuning fork alone?
Yes.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top