Does the rotating black hole have a double or single photon sphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the characteristics of the photon sphere in rotating black holes, particularly whether it has a single or double photon sphere. The established photon sphere radius is at 3r_g, where gravitational acceleration exceeds centripetal acceleration for light. However, calculations suggest that light may orbit closer, around 2.414r_g, without being captured. The conversation also references equations from various astrophysical texts that describe how the photon sphere changes with the spin parameter of the black hole, indicating a reduction to 1r_g at maximum spin. There remains ambiguity regarding the existence of a second photon sphere and its relation to the ergosphere, prompting further inquiry into the dynamics of light around rotating black holes.
stevebd1
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
747
Reaction score
41
While it's widely accepted that the photon sphere is equal to

r_{c}=\frac{3Gm}{c^2} or 3r_{g}

r_{g}= gravitational radius (Gm/c^{2})

while looking at the double photon sphere for the rotating black hole I found myself wanting to understand the actual specifics of the photon sphere. According to most sources it's the place where light's momentum can no longer counteract the gravitation pull of the black and spirals into the black hole i.e. the gravitational acceleration of the black hole is greater than the centripetal acceleration of the photon. Based on a 3 sol static black hole, I put this to the test-

radius of photon sphere

r_{c}=\frac{3Gm}{c^2} = 13291.648 m

gravity at photon sphere

a_{g}=\frac{Gm}{r^{2}}\left(1-\frac{2Gm}{rc^{2}}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

= 3.9039e12 m/s^2

Required velocity at photon sphere based on a_{c}=v^{2}/r and that a_{c} (centripetal acceleration) needs to equal a_{g} (gravitational acceleration)

v=\sqrt{a_{g}r} = 2.2779e8 m/s (0.76c)

From the above it seemed that light could orbit closer without being captured, this appears to be at ~10.696.3 m or 2.414r_{g} where the centripetal acceleration of light equals gravity acceleration.

Is there something I've missed or does the 3r_{g} represent the point where light begins to bend due to gravity and the ~2.5r_{g} the point of no return? I was under the impression that the photon sphere was where photons form a stable orbit around the black hole but the info above suggests it closer to the black hole.

regards
Steve
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'm not sure if your latter equations are rigorously legitimate when applied to light.
I mean: i don't think its valid to apply centripetal force on a photon, and perhaps not gravity either.
 
Thanks for the response. I found an equation in the book 'Exploring Black Holes' by Edwin F Taylor & John A Wheeler, pages 5-11 - 5-13, which provides information regarding r_{c}=3r_{g}'-

\frac{1-2\left(\frac{r_{g}}{r_{c}}\right)}{r_{c}^{2}}=\frac{1}{b^{2}}

r_{g}= gravitational radius, r_{c}= photon sphere, b= b_{critical}=r_{g}\sqrt{27}=r_{g}5.196

from the book-
'The RHS of the equation is the measure of the radial velocity of the particle which depends, through b, on the choice of orbit but not on the Schwarzschild geometry. The LHS equation depends on the Schwarzschild geometry but not on choice of orbit'.

b is the impact parameter, the perpendicular distance between the velocity vector of the photon and the black hole it's approaching. (basically, any photon approaching within this zone will collide with the black hole, any photon approaching on the edge of this zone, b_{critical}, will end up in the photon sphere

As this applies to a static black hole, I'd be interested in knowing how it applies to a rotating black hole. Also while there are two photon spheres when looking at the rotating black hole from the equator, it seems they might converge at the poles (as with the ergosphere and outer event horizon), as there is no frame-dragging to create corotation & counterrotation. it would be interesting to know what would dictate the radius at the poles.

There's probably a way of extracting r_{c} but it looks like it might end up as a cubic equation.

Steve
 
Last edited:
photon sphere radius for static and rotating black holes-

r_{ph}=2r_{g}\left[1+cos\left(\frac{2}{3}arccos(-a)\right)\right]

r_{ph}- photon sphere, r_{g}- gravitational radius, a- spin parameter between 0 - 1

source-
http://www.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/users/mcamenzi/CObjects_06.pdf page 259

(this appears to be an extract from the book 'Compact Objects in Astrophysics' which is available online through Max Camenzind's homepage at The Centre for Astronomy of Heidelberg University (ZAH)).

According to the equation, the photon sphere reduces from 3r_{g} at a=0 to 1r_{g} at a=1 (the event horizon reducing to 1r_{g} at a=1 also).

Interestingly there is no mention of the double photon sphere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
While looking at various sources, there seems to be differing opinion on whether the rotating black hole has a double or single photon sphere. While there is the equation in post #4 that shows a singular photon sphere reducing to the event horizon at a=1, is it possible there is another photon sphere that reduces to the profile of the ergosphere which relates to light going in the opposite direction of the rotation; or does the equation in post #4 simply imply that light isn't affected by rotation (maybe in terms of blueshift and redshift but not in terms of capture). I'd be interested to hear other peoples points of view regarding this.

regards
Steve
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top