Does the Speed of Light Remain Constant in All Scenarios?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the constancy of the speed of light, particularly in scenarios involving an observer named Bob who is situated in a moving train car. Participants explore how different signals (bullets, sound, light) behave in relation to Bob's frame of reference and the effects of relative motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Bob's scenarios involve pulling a cord that triggers events at both ends of the train car, with the expectation that the speed of different signals (bullets, sound, light) will behave differently due to Bob's motion.
  • In the first two scenarios (bullets and sound), Bob perceives the events as simultaneous due to the mechanics of the situation, despite the train's motion.
  • In the third scenario involving light, one participant argues that Bob will see the light from the front of the train first, while another participant asserts that he will see the light from both ends simultaneously.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of the frame of reference, suggesting that if the scenarios are analyzed from Bob's frame, all events occur simultaneously.
  • Another participant mentions the use of Lorentz Transformation to analyze the scenarios from an inertial reference frame, indicating that while coordinate times and distances differ, Bob's experience remains unchanged.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether Bob sees the light from both ends of the train simultaneously or if he sees it from the front first. There is no consensus on this point, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the constancy of the speed of light in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the significance of the reference frame in determining the simultaneity of events, indicating that assumptions about what constitutes "identical response times" may vary based on the chosen frame of reference.

etcota
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Starting at the beginning and have been having some difficulty explaining the implications of the constancy of the speed of light. Seeking confirmation that I at least have it right. For all scenarios below the observer is Bob standing in the middle of a train car moving at speed v. Bob has a pull cord connected mechanically to each end of the train car such that when he pulls the cord the time to trigger an event at each end of the train car is identical

- Scenario 1) Bob’s cord is attached to guns pointed at his head. He pulls the chords and after identical response times the guns fire . Speed of bullet from the back end of the car is v(b) + v, speed of bullet from the front end of the car is v(b) – v. Bullets hit Bob, who is moving at speed v with the train car, at the same time.
- Scenario 2) Bob’s cord is attached to a mallet that hits a gong when pulled. He pulls the cord and after identical response times the gongs sound. Speed of sound from back of train is v(s) +v, speed of sound from front of train is v(s) – v. Sound reaches Bob, who is moving at speed v with the train, at the same time.
- Scenario 3) Bob’s cord is attached to flashlights pointed at him. He pulls the cord and after identical response times the flashlights turn on. Speed of light from the back of train is c and speed of light from front of train is c. Bob, moving at speed v with the train car sees the light from the front of the car first.

Is this the gist of it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
etcota said:
Starting at the beginning and have been having some difficulty explaining the implications of the constancy of the speed of light. Seeking confirmation that I at least have it right. For all scenarios below the observer is Bob standing in the middle of a train car moving at speed v. Bob has a pull cord connected mechanically to each end of the train car such that when he pulls the cord the time to trigger an event at each end of the train car is identical

- Scenario 1) Bob’s cord is attached to guns pointed at his head. He pulls the chords and after identical response times the guns fire . Speed of bullet from the back end of the car is v(b) + v, speed of bullet from the front end of the car is v(b) – v. Bullets hit Bob, who is moving at speed v with the train car, at the same time.
- Scenario 2) Bob’s cord is attached to a mallet that hits a gong when pulled. He pulls the cord and after identical response times the gongs sound. Speed of sound from back of train is v(s) +v, speed of sound from front of train is v(s) – v. Sound reaches Bob, who is moving at speed v with the train, at the same time.
- Scenario 3) Bob’s cord is attached to flashlights pointed at him. He pulls the cord and after identical response times the flashlights turn on. Speed of light from the back of train is c and speed of light from front of train is c. Bob, moving at speed v with the train car sees the light from the front of the car first.

Is this the gist of it?
No, Bob will see the light from both ends of the train at the same time.

As far as the train and the air in the train and all the items in the train and Bob, traveling at v along the tracks is identical to being stationary on the tracks.

If you set up your scenarios in the Inertial Reference Frame (IRF) of the train and then used the Lorentz Transformation to transform them to the IRF of the tracks, you would find that the Coordinate Times and Distances would all be different, but it wouldn't change what Bob experiences.
 
etcota said:
He pulls the chords and after identical response times the guns fire .

...

He pulls the cord and after identical response times the gongs sound.

...

He pulls the cord and after identical response times the flashlights turn on.

"Identical response times" with respect to which frame? Bob's frame (the train frame) or the stationary frame? This is the key thing that makes the difference.

If, as I suspect, you mean "identical response times with respect to Bob's frame", then, as ghwellsjr pointed out, all three pairs of things arrive at Bob at the same time (where here, "time" is unambiguous because both items in the pair are at the same point in space as well): the pair of bullets, the pair of sounds, and the pair of light rays.

In fact, all of your reasoning involving the speed v of the train is irrelevant in this case, because, as ghwellsjr pointed out, as far as Bob and the bullets and sounds and light rays are concerned, Bob's frame is the "stationary" frame, and the fact that the train happens to be moving relative to the ground doesn't come into it.
 
Thank you both for your responses. Got it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 111 ·
4
Replies
111
Views
10K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K