Light's Speed & Moving Observer: What Happens?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter danielhaish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Observer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of light's speed in relation to moving observers and sources, particularly in the context of special relativity. Participants explore concepts such as the speed of light, relativistic velocity addition, and the implications of moving light sources, with a focus on theoretical understanding rather than practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the speed of light from a moving source could appear to exceed the speed of light when combined with the speed of the source, drawing analogies to walking on a moving train.
  • Others argue that the speed of light is invariant and remains constant at c, regardless of the motion of the source or observer, referencing the postulates of special relativity.
  • A participant questions how light from a moving source can maintain its speed relative to a stationary observer, indicating confusion about the implications of time dilation and relative motion.
  • Several participants emphasize the need to understand relativistic velocity addition and the relativistic Doppler effect to clarify these concepts.
  • There are repeated suggestions for participants to consult textbooks or more reliable sources for a comprehensive understanding of special relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of light's speed in relation to moving sources and observers. While some agree on the invariance of light's speed, others remain uncertain or confused about the implications of this principle, leading to unresolved questions and competing interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants exhibit varying levels of understanding of special relativity, with some statements indicating a lack of clarity on fundamental concepts such as time dilation and relativistic effects. The discussion reflects a mix of informal learning sources and formal theoretical frameworks.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring the principles of special relativity, the behavior of light in different reference frames, and the implications of motion on observed phenomena in physics.

danielhaish
Messages
152
Reaction score
10
for example the car headlight would look faster then c speed. (it speed would be the speed of light +the speed of the car) to observer in front the car.
because the light come from the car so the speed of the car would connect with light speed (like when you walk on a train) .
so does the light wave go slower then the c speed in that case? when the source of light is moving .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Pleas reformulate these as rational thought. Faster than what? slower than what?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi, Vanadium 50 and danielhaish
hutchphd said:
Pleas reformulate these as rational thought. Faster than what? slower than what?
is it batter now?
 
Not really.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danielhaish and etotheipi
Vanadium 50 said:
Not really.
I edit it again
 
danielhaish said:
for example the car headlight would look faster then the speed of light (the speed of light +the speed of the car) to observer in front the car.
because the light come from the car so the speed of the car would connect with light speed (like when you walk on a train) .
Walking on a train doesn't work the way you are thinking. The train is moving at 50 km/hr, you're walking up the aisle at a speed of 5 km/hr relative to the train, you are NOT moving at 55 km/hr relatove to an observer on the ground.

Search this forum and google for "relativistic velocity addition"
 
Nugatory said:
Walking on a train doesn't work the way you are thinking. The train is moving at 50 km/hr, you're walking up the aisle at a speed of 5 km/hr relative to the train, you are NOT moving at 55 km/hr relatove to an observer on the ground.

Search this forum and google for "relativistic velocity addition"
I know so I am asking weather the speed of light connect with the speed of the car relative to observer on the ground? because as you said your speed and the train speed connect relative to observer on the ground
 
danielhaish said:
I know so I am asking weather the speed of light connect with the speed of the car relative to observer on the ground? because as you said your speed and the train speed connect relative to observer on the ground
The speed of light, by the postulates of SR and as confirmed by experiment, is ##c## in both the ground frame and the car frame of reference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cianfa72 and danielhaish
PeroK said:
The speed of light, by the postulates of SR and as confirmed by experiment, is ##c## in both the ground frame and the car frame of reference.
but what would happen to get this if the time on the car would go slower it wouldn't mind to outside observer it will steal experience that the light is going faster
 
  • #10
danielhaish said:
but what would happen to get this if the time on the car would go slower it wouldn't mind to outside observer it will steal experience that the light is going faster
Something is lost in translation there.

If you want to understand how the special theory of relativity supports the invariance of of the speed of light then you need to study material on SR (special relativity).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danielhaish
  • #11
Einstein worked this all out. If you are interested in learning about Special Relativity, please get a book and put in the effort.
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
Something is lost in translation there.

If you want to understand how the special theory of relativity supports the invariance of of the speed of light then you need to study material on SR (special relativity).
I understand that if observer moves then it experience light slower but what if the light is coming from moving source how would it stay in the same speed relative to not moving observer
 
Last edited:
  • #13
danielhaish said:
I understand that if observer moves then it experience time slower but what if the time is coming from moving source how would it stay in the same speed relative to not moving observer
Where are you learning SR? Your statements don't make much sense.
 
  • #14
Times, distances, and therefore clock synchrony all depend upon frame of reference. You will not figure this out by asking a series of disjoint questions. It is a comprehensive theory and you need to take the time to study it comprehensively.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, PeroK and danielhaish
  • #15
PeroK said:
Where are you learning SR? Your statements don't make much sense.
I saw it on youtube video . and sorry meant to type if the light coming from moving source . but imagine that a star is going a way from us how can the light coming from stay in the same speed relative to us
 
  • #16
danielhaish said:
I saw it on youtube video

You should not be trying to learn physics from pop science sources. You should be learning it from a textbook. Taylor & Wheeler's Spacetime Physics is a good textbook for SR.

danielhaish said:
imagine that a star is going a way from us how can the light coming from stay in the same speed relative to us

Because velocities in relativity don't add linearly. You have already been told to look up "relativistic velocity addition". All textbooks on SR discuss it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #17
@danielhaish , we try to be understanding of people whose first language is not English. But we are in a situation where we don't understand your questions and you don't understand our answers. And that's not helping anyone.

The suggestion to get a text is a good one, and I would amend that to "a text in your native language".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #18
I think I found answer that connected to doppler low but I am not sure
 
  • #19
danielhaish said:
for example the car headlight would look faster then c speed. (it speed would be the speed of light +the speed of the car) to observer in front the car.
No. You are using here the classical velocity addition ##u=u'+v##. Instead, you must use the relativistic formula:
##u = \frac{u' + v}{1+ u'v/c²}##

If you set ##u' := c##, what is the result for ##u## ?

Source (see "Eq. 10"):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity#Lorentz_transformation_of_velocities

P.S.
The same is valid for your thread from March.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danielhaish and PeroK
  • #20
danielhaish said:
I think I found answer that connected to doppler low but I am not sure

The relativistic Doppler effect tells how the frequency and wavelength of light depend on the source's motion relative to the observer. The relativistic Doppler effect formula assumes that the speed of light is ##c## regardless of the source's motion relative to the observer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and danielhaish
  • #21
To summarize in simple terms:

It does not matter if whatever created that light is moving away from you
It does not matter if whatever created that light is moving towards you
It does not matter the speed at which whatever created that light is moving

The speed of light is always C in ALL directions!

For example: If you had 2 spaceships that travel at 0.6C moving in opposite directions from each other and one emits a beam of light, that beam of light will still get to ther other ship as it's still moving faster than the ship going in the opposite direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: danielhaish

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
971
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K