Does the Taylor series for arctan converge at x = 1?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of the Taylor series for arctan at x = 1, specifically the series $$\arctan(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n+1}}{2n+1}$$ which converges for |x| < 1. Participants emphasize the necessity of proving that this series converges to ##\arctan(1)##, which equals $$\frac{\pi}{4}$$. The conversation references Abel's theorem to establish that if the series converges, then $$\lim_{x \to 1^-} f(x) = a$$ holds true, confirming the convergence at the boundary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor series and their convergence properties
  • Familiarity with the arctangent function and its series representation
  • Knowledge of complex analysis, particularly the concept of analytic functions
  • Awareness of Abel's theorem and its implications for series convergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Abel's theorem in detail
  • Explore the properties of alternating series and their convergence criteria
  • Learn about complex analysis and the implications of differentiability on analyticity
  • Investigate geometric interpretations of series convergence, particularly in relation to the arctangent function
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus and complex analysis, and anyone interested in the convergence of series and their applications in mathematical proofs.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Show that $$\frac{\pi}{4} = 1 - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{7} + \cdots$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmyluu, Greg Bernhardt and topsquark
Physics news on Phys.org
We have

\begin{align*}
\arctan (z) = z - \frac{z^3}{3} + \frac{z^5}{5} - \frac{z^7}{7} + \cdots = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^n z^{2n+1}}{2n+1} ; \quad |z| \leq 1 \quad z \not= \pm i
\end{align*}

So that

\begin{align*}
\frac{\pi}{4} = \arctan (1) = 1 - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{7} + \cdots = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}
\end{align*}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and topsquark
The expansion ##\arctan z=z-\frac{z^3}{3}+\ldots## follows from general theory for ##|z|<1.## The assertion ##\arctan(1)=1-\frac{1}{3}+\ldots## needs some additional work. Namely, one must show that the series in the right side converges to ##\arctan(1)## indeed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby, julian and topsquark
wrobel said:
The expansion ##\arctan z=z-\frac{z^3}{3}+\ldots## follows from general theory for ##|z|<1.## The assertion ##\arctan(1)=1-\frac{1}{3}+\ldots## needs some additional work. Namely, one must show that the series in the right side converges to ##\arctan(1)## indeed.
Because ##\dfrac{1}{1+z^2}## only converges for ##|z| < 1##?
 
julian said:
Because ##\dfrac{1}{1+z^2}## only converges for ##|z| < 1##?
Because it is insufficient to prove that 1-1/3+... converges, one must prove that it converges to ##\arctan 1##
 
wrobel said:
Because it is insufficient to prove that 1-1/3+... converges, one must prove that it converges to ##\arctan 1##
Well, since arctanz is Complex-analytic; entire actually, that should be enough.
 
Last edited:
WWGD said:
Well, since arctanz is Complex-analytic; entire actually, that should be enough.
By which theorem is it enough? Consider me as a wet blanket but I think that if we are solving a math problem, we must refer to mathematical theorems and apply them. For example, the result follows from
Theorem (Abel). Assume we have an analytic function
$$f(z)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_kz^k,\quad a_k\in\mathbb{R}$$ and
the Taylor series is convergent in ##\{|z|<1\}##. If a series
##a=\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_k## converges then
$$\lim_{\mathbb{R}\ni x\to 1-}f(x)=a.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and PeroK
  • #10
wrobel said:
By which theorem is it enough? Consider me as a wet blanket but I think that if we are solving a math problem, we must refer to mathematical theorems and apply them. For example, the result follows from
Theorem (Abel). Assume we have an analytic function
$$f(z)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_kz^k,\quad a_k\in\mathbb{R}$$ and
the Taylor series is convergent in ##\{|z|<1\}##. If a series
##a=\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_k## converges then
$$\lim_{\mathbb{R}\ni x\to 1-}f(x)=a.$$
I thought we were working over the Complexes, where analiticity is guaranteed by differentiability.
 
  • #11
WWGD said:
I thought we were working over the Complexes, where analiticity is guaranteed by differentiability.
We are working over complexes. Please present your argument as a formal proof.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #12
wrobel said:
We are working over complexes. Please present your argument as a formal proof.
You mean that a differentiable function is infinitely-differentiable and analytic?
 
  • #13
Isn't this one of the mainstream results in Complex Analysis? Differentiability implies ##C^{\infty}##, implies Analytic?
 
  • #14
WWGD said:
You mean that a differentiable function is infinitely-differentiable and analytic?
I mean posts #5, 6
How does your answer from #6 solve the problem formulated in #5?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #15
WWGD said:
Isn't this one of the mainstream results in Complex Analysis? Differentiability implies ##C^{\infty}##, implies Analytic?
The issue is whether the Taylor series for ##\arctan## converges to the function at the radius of convergence (that is to say at ##x = 1##). We can take that the Taylor series converges to the function value within the radius of convergence, but not at the radius itself. That's a standard result. In this case we have:
$$\arctan(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n+1}}{2n+1} \ \ \ (|x| < 1)$$The question is what happens at ##x = 1##? The series for ##x = 1## converges, by the alternating series test, but does it converge to ##\arctan(1)##?

Note that I posted a proof from Wiki above (post #9), that uses integration over the interval ##(0, 1)## to prove the equality at the endpoint.

I'd also be interested to see an alternative proof using complex numbers, if you could supply one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #16
We will evaluate

\begin{align*}
\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^k \sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} = - \sum_{k=1}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^{k-1}}{2k-1}
\end{align*}

I will express the sum via a complex contour integration. It employs the fact that the function

\begin{align*}
\dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{\sin \pi z}
\end{align*}

has simple poles at all integer values except when ##\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2} = 0##.

This allows us to write

\begin{align*}
\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^k \sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} = \frac{1}{2i} \oint_C \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} dz
\end{align*}

where the contour ##C## is defined in fig (a).
contoursum.jpg

We have

\begin{align*}
2 \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} & = \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} + \sum_{k=-1}^{-\infty} (-1)^k\frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k}
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2i} \oint_{C+C'} \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} dz
\end{align*}

where the contour ##C'## is defined in fig (a). We complete the path of integration along semicircles at infinity (see fig (b)) since the integrand vanishes there. Since the resulting enclosed area contains no singularities except at ##z=0##, we can shrink this contour down to an infinitesimal circle ##C_0## around the origin (see fig (c)). So that

\begin{align*}
\sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} = \frac{1}{4 i} \oint_{C_0} \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} dz
\end{align*}

We expand the integrand in powers of ##z## about ##z=0## and isolate the ##z^{-1}## term. We get

\begin{align*}
\dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} & = \dfrac{\frac{\pi z}{2} - \cdots}{z [\pi z - \frac{1}{3!} \pi^3 z^3 + \cdots]}
\nonumber \\
& = \dfrac{\frac{\pi z}{2}- \cdots}{z^2 \pi [1 - \frac{1}{6} \pi^2 z^2 + \cdots]}
\nonumber \\
& = \dfrac{\frac{\pi z}{2} - \cdots}{z^2 \pi} (1 + \frac{1}{6} \pi^2 z^2 + \cdots)
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2z} + \cdots
\end{align*}

So that,

\begin{align*}
\sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} & = \frac{1}{4 i} \oint_{C_0} \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} dz
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{4 i} (-2 \pi i) \frac{1}{2}
\nonumber \\
& = - \frac{\pi}{4} .
\end{align*}

So that

\begin{align*}
\frac{\pi}{4} = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^{k-1}}{2k-1} .
\end{align*}
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #17
I think that the shortest proof is via the Taylor series for arctan and Abel's theorem.
 
  • #18
Given a circle and a square which circumscribes that circle, the ratio of areas of that circle to that square is ##\frac{\pi}{4}##.
I wonder if there is a purely geometric construction based series approach to this problem?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wrobel
  • #19
PeroK said:
The issue is whether the Taylor series for ##\arctan## converges to the function at the radius of convergence (that is to say at ##x = 1##). We can take that the Taylor series converges to the function value within the radius of convergence, but not at the radius itself. That's a standard result. In this case we have:
$$\arctan(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n+1}}{2n+1} \ \ \ (|x| < 1)$$The question is what happens at ##x = 1##? The series for ##x = 1## converges, by the alternating series test, but does it converge to ##\arctan(1)##?

Note that I posted a proof from Wiki above (post #9), that uses integration over the interval ##(0, 1)## to prove the equality at the endpoint.

I'd also be interested to see an alternative proof using complex numbers, if you could supply one.
Thanks for clarifying. I missed that obvious point( not being sarcastic) . Embarrassed.
 
  • #20
Same method I used here:

POTW

can be used here as well:

We have

\begin{align*}
\sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^n}{2n+1} & = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi n}{2}}{n}
\nonumber \\
& = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi n}{2}}{n} \int_0^\infty e^{-y} dy
\nonumber \\
& = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \sin \dfrac{\pi n}{2} \int_0^\infty e^{-nx} dx
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2i} \sum_{n=1}^\infty \int_0^\infty (e^{-nx + \frac{i\pi n}{2}} - e^{-nx + \frac{-i\pi n}{2}}) dx
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2i} \int_0^\infty \left( \dfrac{1}{1-e^{-x + \frac{i\pi}{2}}} - \dfrac{1}{1-e^{-x + \frac{-i\pi}{2}}} \right) dx
\nonumber \\
& = \int_0^\infty \dfrac{1} {e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1} {e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\end{align*}

EDIT: Instead of using complex analysis to evaluate the integral, as I originally did, you can use the fact that ##\frac{d}{dx} \tan^{-1} (\sinh x) = \frac{1}{\cosh x}## to obtain:

\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{4} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{2}{e^x + e^{-x}} dx = \frac{1}{4} [\tan^{-1} (\sinh x)]_{-\infty}^\infty = \frac{\pi}{4} .
\end{align*}

----

We will evaluate

\begin{align*}
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1} {e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\end{align*}

by considering the rectangular contour integral (see figure) of

\begin{align*}
\oint_C \dfrac{1} {e^z + e^{-z}} dz
\end{align*}

rectangle.jpg


The integral along the vertical edges vanishes as:

\begin{align*}
f(z) = \dfrac{1}{e^{x+iy} + e^{-x-iy}} =
\begin{cases}
e^{- (x+iy)} & x \rightarrow \infty \\
e^{(x+iy)} & x \rightarrow - \infty \\
\end{cases}
\end{align*}

So that

\begin{align*}
\oint_C \dfrac{1}{e^z + e^{-z}} dz & = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1}{e^x + e^{-x}} dx + \int_{-\infty+ i \pi}^{\infty + i \pi} \dfrac{1}{e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\nonumber \\
& = 2 \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1} {e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\end{align*}

and so

\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1}{e^x + e^{-x}} dx & = \frac{i \pi}{2} \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \oint_C \dfrac{1}{e^z + e^{-z}} dz
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{i \pi}{2} \lim_{z \rightarrow \frac{i \pi}{2}} (z - \frac{i \pi}{2}) \dfrac{1}{e^z + e^{-z}}
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{i \pi}{2} \lim_{z \rightarrow \frac{i \pi}{2}} \dfrac{1}{e^z - e^{-z}}
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{\pi}{4} .
\end{align*}


So finally,

\begin{align*}
\sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^n}{2n+1} = \frac{\pi}{4} .
\end{align*}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K