Does the Taylor series for arctan converge at x = 1?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the Taylor series for the arctangent function at the point x = 1. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mathematical proofs, and the implications of convergence in the context of complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the series $$\frac{\pi}{4} = 1 - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{7} + \cdots$$ is related to the convergence of the Taylor series for arctan at x = 1.
  • Others argue that the function $$\dfrac{1}{1+z^2}$$ only converges for $$|z| < 1$$, raising questions about the convergence of the series at the boundary.
  • Several participants emphasize that proving convergence to $$\arctan(1)$$ is necessary, not just the convergence of the series itself.
  • Some contributions reference the concept of complex analyticity and the application of Abel's theorem to support their claims about convergence.
  • There is a suggestion that the Taylor series converges within the radius of convergence but may not converge to the function value at the boundary point x = 1.
  • One participant mentions the use of integration over the interval (0, 1) as a method to prove the equality at the endpoint.
  • Another participant expresses interest in alternative proofs using complex numbers.
  • There is a mention of a geometric approach to understanding the ratio of areas of a circle to a circumscribing square, relating it back to the series.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the Taylor series for arctan converges to the function value at x = 1. While some agree on the convergence of the series itself, there is no consensus on its convergence to $$\arctan(1)$$ at that point.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of mathematical theorems in proving convergence, and there are references to the limitations of the series' convergence at the boundary of its radius.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Show that $$\frac{\pi}{4} = 1 - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{7} + \cdots$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmyluu, Greg Bernhardt and topsquark
Physics news on Phys.org
We have

\begin{align*}
\arctan (z) = z - \frac{z^3}{3} + \frac{z^5}{5} - \frac{z^7}{7} + \cdots = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^n z^{2n+1}}{2n+1} ; \quad |z| \leq 1 \quad z \not= \pm i
\end{align*}

So that

\begin{align*}
\frac{\pi}{4} = \arctan (1) = 1 - \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5} - \frac{1}{7} + \cdots = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}
\end{align*}
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and topsquark
The expansion ##\arctan z=z-\frac{z^3}{3}+\ldots## follows from general theory for ##|z|<1.## The assertion ##\arctan(1)=1-\frac{1}{3}+\ldots## needs some additional work. Namely, one must show that the series in the right side converges to ##\arctan(1)## indeed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby, julian and topsquark
wrobel said:
The expansion ##\arctan z=z-\frac{z^3}{3}+\ldots## follows from general theory for ##|z|<1.## The assertion ##\arctan(1)=1-\frac{1}{3}+\ldots## needs some additional work. Namely, one must show that the series in the right side converges to ##\arctan(1)## indeed.
Because ##\dfrac{1}{1+z^2}## only converges for ##|z| < 1##?
 
julian said:
Because ##\dfrac{1}{1+z^2}## only converges for ##|z| < 1##?
Because it is insufficient to prove that 1-1/3+... converges, one must prove that it converges to ##\arctan 1##
 
wrobel said:
Because it is insufficient to prove that 1-1/3+... converges, one must prove that it converges to ##\arctan 1##
Well, since arctanz is Complex-analytic; entire actually, that should be enough.
 
Last edited:
WWGD said:
Well, since arctanz is Complex-analytic; entire actually, that should be enough.
By which theorem is it enough? Consider me as a wet blanket but I think that if we are solving a math problem, we must refer to mathematical theorems and apply them. For example, the result follows from
Theorem (Abel). Assume we have an analytic function
$$f(z)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_kz^k,\quad a_k\in\mathbb{R}$$ and
the Taylor series is convergent in ##\{|z|<1\}##. If a series
##a=\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_k## converges then
$$\lim_{\mathbb{R}\ni x\to 1-}f(x)=a.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and PeroK
  • #10
wrobel said:
By which theorem is it enough? Consider me as a wet blanket but I think that if we are solving a math problem, we must refer to mathematical theorems and apply them. For example, the result follows from
Theorem (Abel). Assume we have an analytic function
$$f(z)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_kz^k,\quad a_k\in\mathbb{R}$$ and
the Taylor series is convergent in ##\{|z|<1\}##. If a series
##a=\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_k## converges then
$$\lim_{\mathbb{R}\ni x\to 1-}f(x)=a.$$
I thought we were working over the Complexes, where analiticity is guaranteed by differentiability.
 
  • #11
WWGD said:
I thought we were working over the Complexes, where analiticity is guaranteed by differentiability.
We are working over complexes. Please present your argument as a formal proof.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #12
wrobel said:
We are working over complexes. Please present your argument as a formal proof.
You mean that a differentiable function is infinitely-differentiable and analytic?
 
  • #13
Isn't this one of the mainstream results in Complex Analysis? Differentiability implies ##C^{\infty}##, implies Analytic?
 
  • #14
WWGD said:
You mean that a differentiable function is infinitely-differentiable and analytic?
I mean posts #5, 6
How does your answer from #6 solve the problem formulated in #5?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #15
WWGD said:
Isn't this one of the mainstream results in Complex Analysis? Differentiability implies ##C^{\infty}##, implies Analytic?
The issue is whether the Taylor series for ##\arctan## converges to the function at the radius of convergence (that is to say at ##x = 1##). We can take that the Taylor series converges to the function value within the radius of convergence, but not at the radius itself. That's a standard result. In this case we have:
$$\arctan(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n+1}}{2n+1} \ \ \ (|x| < 1)$$The question is what happens at ##x = 1##? The series for ##x = 1## converges, by the alternating series test, but does it converge to ##\arctan(1)##?

Note that I posted a proof from Wiki above (post #9), that uses integration over the interval ##(0, 1)## to prove the equality at the endpoint.

I'd also be interested to see an alternative proof using complex numbers, if you could supply one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #16
We will evaluate

\begin{align*}
\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^k \sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} = - \sum_{k=1}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^{k-1}}{2k-1}
\end{align*}

I will express the sum via a complex contour integration. It employs the fact that the function

\begin{align*}
\dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{\sin \pi z}
\end{align*}

has simple poles at all integer values except when ##\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2} = 0##.

This allows us to write

\begin{align*}
\sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^k \sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} = \frac{1}{2i} \oint_C \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} dz
\end{align*}

where the contour ##C## is defined in fig (a).
contoursum.jpg

We have

\begin{align*}
2 \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} & = \sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} + \sum_{k=-1}^{-\infty} (-1)^k\frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k}
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2i} \oint_{C+C'} \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} dz
\end{align*}

where the contour ##C'## is defined in fig (a). We complete the path of integration along semicircles at infinity (see fig (b)) since the integrand vanishes there. Since the resulting enclosed area contains no singularities except at ##z=0##, we can shrink this contour down to an infinitesimal circle ##C_0## around the origin (see fig (c)). So that

\begin{align*}
\sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} = \frac{1}{4 i} \oint_{C_0} \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} dz
\end{align*}

We expand the integrand in powers of ##z## about ##z=0## and isolate the ##z^{-1}## term. We get

\begin{align*}
\dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} & = \dfrac{\frac{\pi z}{2} - \cdots}{z [\pi z - \frac{1}{3!} \pi^3 z^3 + \cdots]}
\nonumber \\
& = \dfrac{\frac{\pi z}{2}- \cdots}{z^2 \pi [1 - \frac{1}{6} \pi^2 z^2 + \cdots]}
\nonumber \\
& = \dfrac{\frac{\pi z}{2} - \cdots}{z^2 \pi} (1 + \frac{1}{6} \pi^2 z^2 + \cdots)
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2z} + \cdots
\end{align*}

So that,

\begin{align*}
\sum_{k=1}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{\sin \dfrac{\pi k}{2}}{k} & = \frac{1}{4 i} \oint_{C_0} \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi z}{2}}{z \sin \pi z} dz
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{4 i} (-2 \pi i) \frac{1}{2}
\nonumber \\
& = - \frac{\pi}{4} .
\end{align*}

So that

\begin{align*}
\frac{\pi}{4} = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^{k-1}}{2k-1} .
\end{align*}
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #17
I think that the shortest proof is via the Taylor series for arctan and Abel's theorem.
 
  • #18
Given a circle and a square which circumscribes that circle, the ratio of areas of that circle to that square is ##\frac{\pi}{4}##.
I wonder if there is a purely geometric construction based series approach to this problem?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wrobel
  • #19
PeroK said:
The issue is whether the Taylor series for ##\arctan## converges to the function at the radius of convergence (that is to say at ##x = 1##). We can take that the Taylor series converges to the function value within the radius of convergence, but not at the radius itself. That's a standard result. In this case we have:
$$\arctan(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{x^{2n+1}}{2n+1} \ \ \ (|x| < 1)$$The question is what happens at ##x = 1##? The series for ##x = 1## converges, by the alternating series test, but does it converge to ##\arctan(1)##?

Note that I posted a proof from Wiki above (post #9), that uses integration over the interval ##(0, 1)## to prove the equality at the endpoint.

I'd also be interested to see an alternative proof using complex numbers, if you could supply one.
Thanks for clarifying. I missed that obvious point( not being sarcastic) . Embarrassed.
 
  • #20
Same method I used here:

POTW

can be used here as well:

We have

\begin{align*}
\sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^n}{2n+1} & = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi n}{2}}{n}
\nonumber \\
& = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \dfrac{\sin \dfrac{\pi n}{2}}{n} \int_0^\infty e^{-y} dy
\nonumber \\
& = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \sin \dfrac{\pi n}{2} \int_0^\infty e^{-nx} dx
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2i} \sum_{n=1}^\infty \int_0^\infty (e^{-nx + \frac{i\pi n}{2}} - e^{-nx + \frac{-i\pi n}{2}}) dx
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2i} \int_0^\infty \left( \dfrac{1}{1-e^{-x + \frac{i\pi}{2}}} - \dfrac{1}{1-e^{-x + \frac{-i\pi}{2}}} \right) dx
\nonumber \\
& = \int_0^\infty \dfrac{1} {e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1} {e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\end{align*}

EDIT: Instead of using complex analysis to evaluate the integral, as I originally did, you can use the fact that ##\frac{d}{dx} \tan^{-1} (\sinh x) = \frac{1}{\cosh x}## to obtain:

\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{4} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{2}{e^x + e^{-x}} dx = \frac{1}{4} [\tan^{-1} (\sinh x)]_{-\infty}^\infty = \frac{\pi}{4} .
\end{align*}

----

We will evaluate

\begin{align*}
\int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1} {e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\end{align*}

by considering the rectangular contour integral (see figure) of

\begin{align*}
\oint_C \dfrac{1} {e^z + e^{-z}} dz
\end{align*}

rectangle.jpg


The integral along the vertical edges vanishes as:

\begin{align*}
f(z) = \dfrac{1}{e^{x+iy} + e^{-x-iy}} =
\begin{cases}
e^{- (x+iy)} & x \rightarrow \infty \\
e^{(x+iy)} & x \rightarrow - \infty \\
\end{cases}
\end{align*}

So that

\begin{align*}
\oint_C \dfrac{1}{e^z + e^{-z}} dz & = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1}{e^x + e^{-x}} dx + \int_{-\infty+ i \pi}^{\infty + i \pi} \dfrac{1}{e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\nonumber \\
& = 2 \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1} {e^x + e^{-x}} dx
\end{align*}

and so

\begin{align*}
\frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \dfrac{1}{e^x + e^{-x}} dx & = \frac{i \pi}{2} \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \oint_C \dfrac{1}{e^z + e^{-z}} dz
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{i \pi}{2} \lim_{z \rightarrow \frac{i \pi}{2}} (z - \frac{i \pi}{2}) \dfrac{1}{e^z + e^{-z}}
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{i \pi}{2} \lim_{z \rightarrow \frac{i \pi}{2}} \dfrac{1}{e^z - e^{-z}}
\nonumber \\
& = \frac{\pi}{4} .
\end{align*}


So finally,

\begin{align*}
\sum_{n=0}^\infty \dfrac{(-1)^n}{2n+1} = \frac{\pi}{4} .
\end{align*}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K