Schools Does the time of submitting grad school applications matter?

AI Thread Summary
Debating whether to take the October or November Physics GRE, the main concern is the potential impact on graduate school admissions if scores are received later. Taking the November test allows for more study time, but there are questions about how this timing affects competitiveness. It is suggested that admissions committees typically do not review applications until after deadlines, meaning there is no advantage to submitting early. Graduate admissions are influenced by the professors who evaluate applications, and their decisions can vary based on the quality of applicants. Strong candidates may receive prompt offers, while others might be placed in a "maybe" category for further comparison. Ultimately, as long as application deadlines are met, the timing of GRE scores should not significantly hinder chances of admission. Seeking advice from current professors at the institution may provide additional insights.
nsatya
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm debating on whether to take the October or November Physics GRE. If I take the November test, I have more time to study, but I was wondering if it would affect my chances of getting admitted to a physics grad program if all the schools got my scores a month later than they otherwise would if I took the October test. Of course, I'm assuming that they will all get my scores before the application deadline. Do the admissions get more competitive the later the applications are submitted? Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phyzguy said:

FYI, this concerns undergraduate admissions.

in terms of graduate admissions, it varies. remember, the people looking over the apps arent administrators or anything--they're the professors who are considering taking you into their research lab. With this in mind, try thinking about graduate school admissions less like school and more like a job.

a. if they have spots open, they're taking applications.
b. if you're a superstar applicant, they'll probably take you right off the bat. most professors tend to know the quality of students they're school gets and if you are way beyond what the average is, I can't see why they'd wait to send you and acceptance letter. (assuming they start looking that early...)
c. if you aren't a superstar applicant, they could just put you in the "maybe" pile until they look at more files to see how you compare. (or toss your application out the door...)

it's so hard to make generalizations because its the profs doing the work!
OP: do you go to a phd granting instutition? try asking some of your professors.

and no, so long as you meet whatever deadlines they have, you should be fine. sending you application in sept probably wouldn't help you...
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top