Does the univeres have size or shape?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phildoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shape
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the universe's size and shape, questioning how it can expand if it originated from an infinitely small point. One viewpoint suggests the universe resembles a four-dimensional sphere, where traveling in one direction eventually leads back to the starting point, similar to Earth's curvature. It is argued that current cosmological models indicate a flat universe, supported by extensive observations across various electromagnetic spectra and neutrino data. These observations are grounded in a robust framework of experimental physics, including nuclear and atomic physics. The coherence between observations and theoretical models reinforces the conclusion about the universe's flatness.
phildoe
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I have heared people say that the universe has no size or shape. My problem with this is how can the universe be expanding or how did it come from an infinitaly small spot(Big Bang). If it is expanding because an infinitly large object can not expand from an infinitly small point.

I think that the universe is like a 4 dimensional sphere. So if you go in any direction in space and keep going eventualy you will be back at your original spot. becaue even though you are going straight in 3 dimensions but the 4th dimension is slowly curving.

Kind of like the Earth even though you are going straight in 2dimensions you are slowly curving in the 3rd dimension.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
How do we know that the universe is so flat?
 
What observations?

Saying the same thing another way, only cosmological models in which the universe is flat provide acceptable matches to the best, current observations of the universe.

These observations have been done using a wide variety of astronomical instruments, across just about the entire electro-magnetic spectrum, and include some initial data from astronomical observations of neutrinos.

Behind these observations is a vast body of experimental results, mostly in physics. Key areas which provide the foundation for the astronomical observations (and their interpretation) include nuclear physics, atomic physics, and good ol' classical dynamics.

On a personal note, what's awesome about all this is that it hangs together so well; the observations and theory are tightly interlocked, and the conclusions - including the one about the universe being flat - are well-constrained.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
256
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
106
Views
11K
Replies
47
Views
651
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top