Does this problem require knowing the density of water?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JeweliaHeart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the molality of an aqueous solution with a given molar mass, density, and molarity. Initially, there was confusion regarding whether the density provided was for the solute or the entire solution. After clarifying that 1.56 g/mL refers to the density of the solution, the correct molality was determined to be 6.67 m. Participants noted the importance of carefully reading problem statements to avoid misinterpretation. Overall, the discussion highlights the necessity of understanding the context of density in solution calculations.
JeweliaHeart
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the molality of an aqueous solution of a compound with a molar mass of 120. g/mol that has a density of 1.56 g/mL and a molarity of 5.78 M?

(A) 6.67 m
(B) 5.78 m
(C) 120. m
(D) 1.56 m
(E) None of the Above

Homework Equations


Molality= moles solute/kilograms solvent


The Attempt at a Solution



I assumed a volume of 1 L of solution, leaving me with 5.78 moles solute.

5.78 moles solute x 120 g/mole solute = 693.6 g solute

693.6 g solute x 1 mL/ 1.56 g solute =444.615 mL (the space taken up by the solute)

1000 ml(b/c I assumed 1 L solution)- 444.615= 555.385 ml (volume of solvent, water)

I don't know where to go from here b/c I don't know what the density of water is at whatever temperature the solution is at.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you are misreading the question. 1.56 g/mL is density of the solution, not of the solute. If so, what is mass of the 1L of the solution? How much of this mass is water?

If 1.56 g/mL is intended to be density of the solute, there is not enough information to solve the problem.
 
Thanks so much Borek.

Yes, I was misreading the problem. I tried solving it again using 1.56 g/mL as the density of the entire solution and I got the right answer, which is a) 6.67 molality.

I got to start reading these problems more carefully. :approve:
 
I am not surprised you misread the problem, it is lousy worded and confusing. For me it was obvious as I have seen zillions of such questions.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top