Does this require More energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pallidin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
Raising a bowling ball on a platform requires the same vertical force regardless of whether the ball is stationary or moving horizontally. The discussion highlights that horizontal momentum does not influence the vertical force needed to lift the ball, as the vertical and horizontal vectors operate independently. The normal force required to support the weight of a moving ball does not increase compared to a static one. The energy involved in lifting the ball remains constant, calculated as gmh, regardless of horizontal movement. Understanding these principles clarifies common misconceptions in physics regarding the relationship between horizontal and vertical forces.
pallidin
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
3
Question scenario:

Let's say that we have a heavy bowling ball and roll it across a horizontal platform that can be vertically raised.

Experimental condition #1: The bowling ball is not moving, and I raise the platform with X amount of force directly underneath the static ball to raise the ball 1-foot.

Experimental condition #2: the bowling ball is given a forceful horizontal movement along the surface of the horizontal platform and, at mid-point of travel, I raise the platform directly underneath the ball to raise the ball 1-foot.

Does condition #2 require more upward force than #1 ?

This is not a homework Q. Just curious. I assume the answer is yes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you assume yes? Why would the amount of force required to raise the platform depend on the horizontal speed of the ball?
 
Doc Al said:
Why would you assume yes? Why would the amount of force required to raise the platform depend on the horizontal speed of the ball?

I don't know, Doc, that's why I'm asking.

Doc, my assumption, perhaps erroneous, is based on my notion that a horizontal momentum influences a vertical thrust.
I find it rather odd that horizontal momentum does not negatively influence an outside vertical.
Granted, the vectors are not opposing, but surely there would be a resultant vector shift. Perhaps this resultant vector shift does not oppose the applied vertical force, so, I have another question:

Does your answer also apply with respect to a accelerating ball?
 
I fail to see why a horizontal velocity (or acceleration) would have any bearing on the force required to produce a vertical acceleration.
 
Doc Al said:
I fail to see why a horizontal velocity (or acceleration) would have any bearing on the force required to produce a vertical acceleration.

I find it hard to believe that a planar vector shift expends the same energy on a static-vs-moving mass. But I'm sure you are correct.

Post edited.
 
Last edited:
Not sure what you mean by "planar vector shift". The same vertical force exerted through the same vertical displacement will perform the same amount of work. (The horizontal displacement is irrelevant.)

To just support the bowling ball a normal force is required. Does a horizontally moving ball require a greater normal force to support its weight? No.
 
The question is ill-defined. You could apply more force case 2 if you wanted to - you haven't said how fast you are accelerating the bowling ball upwards in either case.

The energy (from your title) is the same though: gmh.
 
Very good. Thanks to both Doc and Russ for helping me to understand this better. I have always loved physics, and even know a thing or two, but sometimes the basics stump me!
 
perpendicular vectors are independent of each other
 
Back
Top