Does this theorem have a name?

  • Thread starter Thread starter techmologist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a theorem relating the integral of the cross product of the unit tangent and unit normal vectors over a curve C to the mean curvature of a surface S. The equation presented, which can be derived from Stokes' theorem, is expressed as the integral of the tangent and normal vectors equating to a function of the mean curvature. The mean curvature H is defined as half the trace of the second fundamental form, linking it to the divergence of the normal vector. The derivation clarifies the relationship between the geometry of the surface and the integrals involved. The theorem appears to be a known result, although its specific name is not identified.
techmologist
Messages
305
Reaction score
12
For a surface S bounded by a curve C,

\int_{C} \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n}ds = -2\int_{S} H \mathbf{n}da

t is the unit tangent to C, and n is the unit normal to the surface S. H is the mean curvature of S. It can be derived from Stokes' theorem, but it seems like the kind of result that might have been known earlier.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For any constant vector c,

\mathbf{c} \cdot \int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = \int_C (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{c}) \cdot \mathbf{t} ds =\int_S \nabla \times (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{c}) \cdot \mathbf{n}da

Using the vector identity

\nabla \times (\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{b}) = \mathbf{b} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{a} - \mathbf{a} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{b} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{a} ) \mathbf{b} + (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{b} )\mathbf{a}

and the fact that c is constant, the above integral becomes

\int_S [\mathbf{c}\cdot \nabla \mathbf{n} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n})\mathbf{c} ] \cdot \mathbf{n} da <br /> =<br /> \mathbf{c} \cdot \int_S (\nabla \mathbf{n} ) \cdot \mathbf{n} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n }) \mathbf{n} da

The first term in the integrand is zero, since it is just the gradient of the length of the unit normal. Also, since the vector c was arbitrary, its dot product with the integral can be dropped:


\int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = -\int_S (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n} ) \mathbf{n} da

Depending on how you define the normal (outward or inward), div n = -2H up to a sign*. So that gives the result

\int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = \int_S 2H \mathbf{n} da

I had an extra minus sign in the first post.


* The mean curvature H of a surface is equal to half the trace of the second fundamental form B: 2H = gjkbjk. The components of the second fundamental form can be defined as

b_{jk} = -\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{n}_{,k} = -\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{n}_{,k} = - n^i_{{ };k}\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{x}_i = -n^i_{{ };k}g_{ij}

Multiplying both sides by the inverse of g_ij and then summing the diagonal elements gives

g^{jk}b_{jk} = - n^k_{{ };k} = -\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n}
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top