I Does Vitamin Intake Impact Weight Gain in Students?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyto alba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
Tyto alba
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
'In inferential statistics, the term "null hypothesis" is a general statement or default position that there is no relationship between two measured phenomena, or no association among groups.' (wiki)

The book I'm following has to say :

Q: In a nutritional study 13 students were given a usual diet with vitamin tablets and 12 set of other students were given only the normal diet. After 12 months their weights are measured as given below (a 2 x 13 table in which weight gains of the two set of students are mentioned) Can you say that vitamins were responsible for this difference?

A: Ho= Vitamins are responsible for this difference HA= just the ooposite, not responsible

The t-value turned out to be more the p-value and they rejected the Ho

P.S. I'm sure it isn't right because Vitamin rich diet does cause weight gain and given the concept of null hypothesis the Ho assumed in the excerpt should be wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SanjuktaGhosh said:
Q: In a nutritional study 13 students were given a usual diet with vitamin tablets and 12 set of other students were given only the normal diet. After 12 months their weights are measured as given below (a 2 x 13 table in which weight gains of the two set of students are mentioned)
Did you state this problem correctly? A 2x13 table has 26 entries, but you only mentioned 13+12 = 25 students.
 
The book's null hypothesis is rather wrong. You should flip the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis statements. The default position for your null hypothesis should be that there is no effect observed.
 
SanjuktaGhosh said:
Can you say that vitamins were responsible for this difference?
The question is poorly expressed. Your null hypothesis should be that there is no (statistically significant) difference between the vitamin group and the non-vitamin group. If there is a difference (H0 rejected), it is a further conceptual step to say that the vitamins are "responsible" for it. Statistical correlation does not imply causal dependency.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top