Doing algebra on infenetesimal amounts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Hey. I always assumed that when calculating with infinitesimal amounts, like dV = infinitesimal change in volume, you can play around with them the same as you'd do with regular numbers.

For example, you if you multiply dV/dt with dr/dr, you have dV/dt=dV/dr * dr/dt. And so on.

What exactly are the restrictions? I'm having my first calculus exam at university level tomorrow, and I thought I could use some help.

Also: Do you guys have any tips on general strategies for solving hard/unexpected Calculus problems?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your question could be interpreted two different ways:

1) What are the guidelines for the informal manipulation of symbols like "dx", 'dV" when doing calculus?

or

2) Is there a system of mathematics that defines infintesimal numbers and the rules they obey?

The best advice for 1) is not to think of symbols such as "dx" as a kind of number. Think of them as pnemonics - things that help you remember facts about calculus. Physics texts often reason with "infinitesimals". I've never seen an orderly presentation of how to do this. Perhaps you learn only by studying many examples. The general idea seems to be that symbols for infinitesimals with the same "order" (exponent) have some meaningful result when they are added, multiplied or divided. Symbols of a different order don't necessaily. Usually "higher order" infinitesimals are "neglected" and the answer is given by the lower order infinitesimals.

The answer to 2) is yes (see "nonstandard analysis"), but the manipulations you see in your current studies aren't based on knowing that system and most people who use calculus never study nonstandard analysis.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top