Don't understand this application of the transform of an integral

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of the Laplace transform to the integral of a function, specifically $$L\{ 1*{ t }^{ 3 }\}$$. Participants clarify that the integral $$\int _{ 0 }^{ t }{ f(\tau )d\tau }$$ requires careful handling of variables, as the function f depends on tau in the integral but on t in the transform. A substitution of variables is suggested to simplify the integral, leading to the conclusion that the original identity for the Laplace transform does not apply directly due to variable dependency. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing dummy variables in integrals and their implications for function evaluation. Ultimately, understanding the distinction between the variables involved is crucial for correctly applying the Laplace transform.
Turion
Messages
145
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



$$L\{ 1*{ t }^{ 3 }\}$$

Homework Equations



$$L\{ \int _{ 0 }^{ t }{ f(\tau )d\tau } \} =\frac { L\{ f(t)\} }{ s }$$

The Attempt at a Solution



$$L\{ 1*{ t }^{ 3 }\} \\ =L\{ \int _{ 0 }^{ t }{ { (t-\tau ) }^{ 3 }d\tau } \} \\ =\frac { L\{ { t }^{ 3 }\} }{ s } \\ =\frac { 6 }{ { s }^{ 5 } }$$

The function in the integral is a function of t and tau so how was the identity under "relevant equations" applied?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you have ##\int_0^tf(\tau,t)\,d\tau## in the integral instead of ##\int_0^tf(\tau)\,d\tau## and the formula for integral doesn't work. This is convolution so:

##L\{1*t^3\}=L\{1\}\cdot L\{t^3\}##
 
Turion said:

Homework Statement



$$L\{ 1*{ t }^{ 3 }\}$$

Homework Equations



$$L\{ \int _{ 0 }^{ t }{ f(\tau )d\tau } \} =\frac { L\{ f(t)\} }{ s }$$

The Attempt at a Solution



$$L\{ 1*{ t }^{ 3 }\} \\ =L\{ \int _{ 0 }^{ t }{ { (t-\tau ) }^{ 3 }d\tau } \} \\ =\frac { L\{ { t }^{ 3 }\} }{ s } \\ =\frac { 6 }{ { s }^{ 5 } }$$

The function in the integral is a function of t and tau so how was the identity under "relevant equations" applied?
Use the substitution ##u=t-\tau## on the integral to convert it to a more familiar form.
 
@szynkasz: Thanks. I solved it.

vela said:
Use the substitution ##u=t-\tau## on the integral to convert it to a more familiar form.

knawF7X.png


Any suggestions?
 
Remember that ##u## is a dummy variable.
 
vela said:
Remember that ##u## is a dummy variable.

Yeah, I substituted it back in the last step so there is no more u. I'm not sure how that would help me.
 
I don't think you understood my point. In the integral ##\int_0^t u^3\,du##, it doesn't matter what letter we use for the variable of integration. It's a dummy variable.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DummyVariable.html

If you evaluated the integral, what variable is it a function of?
 
vela said:
I don't think you understood my point. In the integral ##\int_0^t u^3\,du##, it doesn't matter what letter we use for the variable of integration. It's a dummy variable.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DummyVariable.html

If you evaluated the integral, what variable is it a function of?

It's a function of u which is the same thing as saying it's a function of t - tau.
 
Really? Did you actually calculate ##\int_0^t u^3\,du##?
 
  • #10
vela said:
Really? Did you actually calculate ##\int_0^t u^3\,du##?

No, I didn't. The textbook says to apply the identity under "2. Homework Equations " first.
 
  • #11
You wrote
Turion said:
$$L\{ \int _{ 0 }^{ t }{ f(\tau )d\tau } \} =\frac { L\{ f(t)\} }{ s }$$
What variable is ##f## a function of on the left-hand side? What variable is ##f## a function of on the right-hand side? Are they the same? Why not?
 
  • #12
vela said:
You wrote
What variable is ##f## a function of on the left-hand side? What variable is ##f## a function of on the right-hand side? Are they the same? Why not?

On the left hand side, f is a function of tau. On the right hand side, f is a function of t. They are not the same. I'm not sure why they're not the same but I can dig up the proof for it I guess. I think they're not the same because we're doing a transformation.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
I found the proof:

jhaaAgt.png


Honestly, that proof (as most proofs) went right over my head.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
944
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K