Doped semiconductor, donor electron radius

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the radius of a donor electron's orbit in a doped semiconductor, with specific parameters including ε/ε0 = 17.9 and m* = 0.015*m_e. The binding energy formula provided is E=(13.6eV)*(m*/m_e)*(epsilon_0/epsilon)^2, but the user struggles to connect this to the Bohr radius equations. A suggested approach involves using the modified Bohr radius for the exciton, which incorporates the effective mass and dielectric constant. Clarification on notation differences in constants was also noted as a source of confusion. The thread concludes with a helpful exchange of formulas and insights on the topic.
Yroyathon
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
hi folks, almost done my semester of physics. this problem has my goat, can't quite figure it out. Done web searches endlessly, but most of the links are pdf articles that I can't access.

Homework Statement


A donor electron moves in doped semiconductor, for which ε/ε0 = 17.9 and m* = 0.015*m_e. Find the radius of a circular atomic orbit of such an electron in terms of the Bohr radius a_0 (Fig. 43-37). The effective nuclear charge for such a loosely bound electron is Z = 1.
ans= ____ a_0

Homework Equations


the binding energy E=(13.6eV)*(m*/m_e)*(epsilon_0/epsilon)^2

The Attempt at a Solution


(the figure is unimportant: a circle with a dot in it; I didn't include it)

so I've gotten the binding energy, which is pretty small. but I'm unsure how to connect this to the Bohr equations for radius. or, I'm not even sure if that's the right approach to take.

my question is, given this new binding/ionization energy, how can you find the radius?

Tips or suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks.

,Yroyathon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you can look up the bohr radius of an electron and proton...

a_0 = \frac{4\pi \epsilon_0 \hbar^2}{m_e e^2}

For the exciton you get...

a_{x0} = \frac{4\pi \epsilon\hbar^2}{m_{r}^* e^2} = \frac{\epsilon}{\epsilon_0}\cdot\frac{m_e}{m_r^*}\cdot a_0

Where 1/m_r^* = 1/m_e^* + 1/m_h^*.

P.S.: You might want to check my work.
 
thank you. that was exactly what I needed. I'd seen something similar to this in my web searches, but with the differences in constant notation (epsilon vs. epsilon_0 vs. kappa vs, etc.) I was pretty confused as to what was in the formula.

thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top