Double integral of a Log (natural)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the double integral of the logarithmic function A(x,y) over the rectangle defined by [-a,a] in u and [-b,b] in v using Mathematica. The participants highlight discrepancies in results based on the order of integration, leading to a difference expressed as (x-y)(x+y) multiplied by a series of ArcTan functions. They also explore the conditions under which the integral diverges, particularly when the logarithm's argument approaches zero, and discuss the implications of integrating first with respect to u or v. The final results indicate that both integration orders yield finite results within the boundary, but the differences depend on the order of integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals and their properties
  • Familiarity with Mathematica for symbolic computation
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their behavior near zero
  • Basic understanding of ArcTan functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Mathematica's Integrate function for advanced symbolic integration techniques
  • Study the properties of logarithmic functions and their limits
  • Learn about the implications of changing the order of integration in double integrals
  • Investigate the behavior of ArcTan functions in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques using Mathematica.

Mbert
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I wish to find the following integral over the rectangle [-a,a] in u and [-b,b] in v using Mathematica. The constants a and b are positive (and non-zero). The variables x and y are in Reals.

A(x,y)=\int_{-a}^a{\int_{-b}^b{\log{\left[(u-x)^2+(v-y)^2\right]}{\rm d}v}{\rm d}u}

Homework Equations



see above

The Attempt at a Solution



I find using Mathematica a different integral depending if I integrate on u or v first. I use the following code:

To integrate on v first:
Code:
Integrate[Log[(u - x)^2 + (v - y)^2], v]
(% /. v -> b) - (% /. v -> -b)
Integrate[%, u]
(% /. u -> a) - (% /. u -> -a)

To integrate on u first:
Code:
Integrate[Log[(u - x)^2 + (v - y)^2], u]
(% /. u -> a) - (% /. u -> -a)
Integrate[%, v]
(% /. v -> b) - (% /. v -> -b)

The difference between these two (definite) double integrals is:
(x-y) (x+y) \left(\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a-x}{b-y}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a+x}{b-y}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b-y}{a-x}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b-y}{a+x}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a-x}{b+y}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a+x}{b+y}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b+y}{a-x}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b+y}{a+x}\right]\right)

Could someone please tell me what I am doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know, there is a relation
\arctan(\frac{1}{x}) = \frac{\pi}{2} sgn(x) - \arctan(x)
By looking at your fractions, you will see that there is always one that is reciprocal to another. So I'm guessing that under certain conditions, you will get 0.

I'm saying under certain conditions, because I suspect the integral to diverge for -a<y<a and -b<x<b and then you can't expect to get 0 anymore, but it's just a guessing, I could be wrong, you should apply the relation and see if and when you get 0.
 
Thank you.

Wouldn't it diverge for y=+ or - b and x=+ or - a? Why would it diverge for values in between? I think this should be defined up to the boundary and the term sgn(x) depends on which side of the boundary we are approaching the limit.
 
Well, my idea was just that, since
\log 0 = -\infty
the integral might diverge in case the argument of the logarithm becomes zero. And as long as -a \leq y \leq a and -b \leq x \leq b, you have this zero in your logarithm. Anyhow, I'm not saying that it is definitely divergent. If you want to be sure, you should do the integration manually. Cheers
 
It seems to give 2*pi inside (−b<y<b and −a<x<a) and Indeterminate on the boundary. Outside the boundary, it gives 0.
 
Does that mean that if I am interested in the domain (−b<y<b and −a<x<a), I can just add the difference between the 2 definite double integrals (which is 2*pi*(x−y)*(x+y))? But then, if I integrate the other double integral first, the difference between them is 2*pi*(y−x)*(y+x)...

How can I make the definite double integral give the same result for (−b<y<b and −a<x<a) whether I integrate u or v first?
 
Well, it certainly seems like there is something fishy if x,y are inside the boundary.
Can you check if you get a finite result for x,y inside the boundary?
 
The result of both integrals inside the boundary is finite. The result inside the boundary of the difference between them is 2*pi*(x−y)*(x+y) or 2*pi*(y−x)*(y+x), depending on which is integrated first.
 
Can you post what you got for one of the integrals?
 
  • #10
\begin{align*}A(x,y,a,b)=-12 a b &amp;+(a-x) (b-y) \text{Log}\left[(a-x)^2+(b-y)^2\right]\\ &amp;+(a+x) (b-y) \text{Log}\left[(a+x)^2+(b-y)^2\right]\\ &amp;+(a-x) (b+y) \text{Log}\left[(a-x)^2+(b+y)^2\right]\\ &amp;+(a+x) (b+y) \text{Log}\left[(a+x)^2+(b+y)^2\right]\\ &amp;+(a-x)^2 \left(-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a-x}{b-y}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{-a+x}{b+y}\right]\right)\\ &amp;+(a+x)^2 \left(-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a+x}{b-y}\right]-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a+x}{b+y}\right]\right)\\ &amp;-(b-y)^2 \left(\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b-y}{a-x}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b-y}{a+x}\right]\right)\\ &amp;-(b+y)^2 \left(\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b+y}{a-x}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b+y}{a+x}\right]\right)\\ &amp;+x^2\left(-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a-x}{b-y}\right]-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a+x}{b-y}\right]-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b-y}{a-x}\right]-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b-y}{a+x}\right]+\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{-a+x}{b+y}\right]-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{a+x}{b+y}\right]-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b+y}{a-x}\right]-\text{ArcTan}\left[\frac{b+y}{a+x}\right]\right)\end{align*}
 
  • #11
If I integrate with respect to the other variable first, the last term is multiplied by y^2 instead of x^2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K