Double Monty - Action At A Distance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simon 6
  • Start date Start date
Simon 6
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
This may mystify some.

Imagine two Monty Hall games taking place simultaneously on different sides of the world. Each game is completely independent and follows the same Monty Hall rules.
Imagine you're a contestant in one of them.

There are three doors - two of them empty, one has a prize.
The host knows what's behind each door.
You pick a door.
The host eliminates an empty door from the remaining two.
You are asked whether you'd like to stick or swap.
You're aware of the familiar solution - that there is a 2/3 chance that the door you originally chose is empty and that the other has the prize.

Before you make your final decision, a phone call is made. You are about to learn whether the contestant on the other side of the world originally chose the same as you or the opposite.

Depending on what you learn, does this knowledge in any way affect the odds of your game
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to explain what you mean by "You are about to learn whether the contestant on the other side of the world originally chose the same as you or the opposite." The question as stated is not very clear.
 
Each game is completely independent

You answered your own question here, this means that Pr(X_1=x|X_2=y)=Pr(X_1=x). So it does not matter what door the other contestant chose, nor what door contained the price on the other game. The Monty Hall game is easier to analyze in terms of probability measures.
 
D H said:
You need to explain what you mean by "You are about to learn whether the contestant on the other side of the world originally chose the same as you or the opposite." The question as stated is not very clear.


I mean you that are informed of one of the following:

a) "Whatever you originally chose, the other contestant picked the same*."

OR

b) "Whatever you originally chose, the other contestant picked the opposite**"


* Same = you both picked an empty door or a prize door but you don't know which.
** Opposite = neither of you picked the same
 
With that clarification, the probabilities are now

case a) Probability that I chose the prize door originally is 1/5, so holding yields the prize door one time out of five which switching yields the prize door four times out of five.

case b) Probability that I chose the prize door originally is 1/2, so both strategies yield equal probabilities.

Since case (a) arises five times out of nine and (b) four times out of nine, the overall probability of winning with a strategy of "always hold" is 5/9*1/5 + 4/9*1/2 = 1/3 and the overall probability of winning with a strategy of "always switch" is 5/9*4/5 + 4/9*1/2 = 2/3, so this new game has the exact same overall probabilities as the original game.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top