Doubling Resistance of 1 Mile Copper Wire - 68 ohms

  • Thread starter Thread starter dymand68
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ohms Resistance
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 1 mile long copper wire with an initial resistance of 68 ohms, and the inquiry focuses on determining the new resistance when the wire is doubled over to function as a single wire.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between resistance, length, and cross-sectional area, with some attempting to apply known principles of resistance. Questions about the inverse square rule are raised, indicating confusion about the relevant concepts.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the concepts related to resistance, with various interpretations being discussed. Some participants suggest that doubling the width and halving the length affects resistance, while others reference external resources for clarification. No consensus has been reached on the correct approach or answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through assumptions about how resistance changes with modifications to the wire's dimensions, and there is a lack of clarity on the foundational principles involved.

dymand68
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1 mile long copper wire has a resistance of 68 ohms. What will be its new resistance when doubling it over and using it as "one" wire



Homework Equations

?
R=V/current



The Attempt at a Solution

unable to attempt, I know that when it is cut in half R=34 ohms
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dymand68 said:
I know that when it is cut in half R=34 ohms
OK. More generally, how does resistance depend on length and cross-sectional area?
 
inverse square rule?
 
the correct answer is 17 ohms...double width, 1/2 length =1/4 resistance?
 
dymand68 said:
the correct answer is 17 ohms...double width, 1/2 length =1/4 resistance?
That's right. As that site explains, the resistance is inversely proportional to the cross-sectional area (which gives one factor 1/2) and directly proportional to the length (which gives a second factor of 1/2).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K