Doubling the kinetic energy of an object does what to momentum?

AI Thread Summary
Doubling the kinetic energy of an object increases its momentum, but not in a straightforward manner, as momentum does not simply double with kinetic energy. The relationship between kinetic energy (KE) and momentum (p) is defined by the equation KE = p²/2m, indicating that while an increase in kinetic energy leads to increased momentum, the relationship is quadratic. A participant expressed confusion about the concept of "negative effect" on momentum, prompting clarification that momentum increases with kinetic energy. Additionally, the discussion touched on the concept of zero momentum in a nest of insects, explaining that their individual momentum vectors can cancel each other out. Overall, the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum is complex and requires careful consideration of their mathematical interdependence.
Faded Maximus
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Would doubling the kinetic energy of an object have any effect on the momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, KE=p^2/2m.
 
Yes,According to this equation showing the relation between momentum and kinetic energy:
E_k = \frac {p^2}{2m}
I tried reversing the equation and I think you should a negative effect on the momentum
 
Last edited:
I tried reversing the equation and I think you should a negative effect on the momentum

What do you mean by negative effect? If the kinetic energy increases the momentum increases (although it won't double).
 
Last edited:
Im stuck on this.

How could a nest of insects have a momentum of zero?
 
Last edited:
Diogenes, momentum is a vector. All the insects momentum vectors could add up to nothing.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top