Doubt in Inertial frame of reference

AI Thread Summary
Newton's laws of motion are not directly applicable in non-inertial frames of reference without adjustments for pseudo forces. While the Earth is technically an accelerating frame due to its rotation, its effects are often negligible for practical experiments like pendulums and ball motion. The assumption of Earth as an inertial frame is valid because the orbital acceleration and rotational effects are minimal on small scales. To apply Newton's laws in such scenarios, one must incorporate pseudo forces to account for the acceleration experienced. This principle also explains larger phenomena, such as weather patterns and the Coriolis effect.
manimaran1605
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Newton's laws of motions are not applicable in Non-inertial frames of reference which means only mutually accelerated frames of references, My question is how can we apply Newton's laws of motions for practical experiments such as simple pendulum, motion of a ball, etc. conducted in near surface of earth

I referred a book it says that orbital acceleration of the Earth is insignificant and the effect of the Earth’s rotation is normally a small correction, the Earth may be assumed to be inertial frame.
I know there is a reason we are assuming Earth may be inertial frame, have some idea that it should be something regarding rotation of frame of reference, but i am unable to reason it precisely, Help me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newtons laws can be applied in arbitrarily accelerating/rotating frames as long as you take into account the pseudo forces.
 
The surface of the Earth is indeed in an accelerating frame of reference, like when you are in a car speeding up. You feel a force pushing you back in your seat which is not due to anything pushing you in the car. It is because the car is accelerating and you are along for the ride. If you want to make Newton's laws work, you account for this by adding an extra force, a pseudo force into Newton's second law.

On the Earth, this acceleration is barely noticeable on small scales, but you can see it for yourself with a Foucault Pendulum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foucault_pendulum
On larger scales, it's a huge driving force in the weather, and why hurricanes spin in opposite directions in the northern and southern hemispheres (it's NOT enough of a force to cause toilets do drain in opposite directions; that's just the shape of the bowl and plumbing).
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top