Doubts in Epitaph of Stevinus .

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iVenky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubts
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the "Epitaph of Stevinus," specifically addressing the interpretation of certain elements within the diagram, such as the significance of the letters "M N O..." and their enclosure. Participants explore concepts related to equilibrium in the context of Stevin's proof regarding inclined planes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the meaning of the letters "M N O..." in the context of the diagram and questions their enclosure.
  • Another participant suggests that the letters may simply be labels for the beads, but does not clarify the significance of their enclosure.
  • A third participant discusses the equilibrium of the "wreath" and presents a relationship between the weights and lengths, introducing the concept of equilibrium under certain conditions.
  • A later reply indicates that the participant understood the concept after reviewing the proof related to Stevin's work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not reach a consensus on the meaning of the letters or their enclosure, as participants have differing interpretations and questions remain unresolved regarding these aspects.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions regarding the density of the wreath and the mass of the rollers that are not fully explored, which may affect the understanding of equilibrium in this context.

iVenky
Messages
212
Reaction score
12
Physics news on Phys.org
iVenky said:
What I can't understand is this- What does those letters "M N O... etc " indicate?
I imagine they are just labels of the beads.
Why is that enclosed?
Why is what enclosed?

There's a description of Stevin's Proof on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclined_plane#History
 
hi iVenky! :smile:

the whole "wreath" is capable of moving round the triangle, keeping the same shape

but (if the wreath has a constant density all the way round, and assuming the rollers have negligible mass) there is obviously no reason for it to do so, and so it must be in equilibrium

ie it is in equilibrium if m1/L1 = m2/L2

multiplying both sides by the height of the triangle gives m1sinθ1 = m2sinθ2 :wink:
 
Thanks I understood the concept after seeing the proof for that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K