Doubts on Ampère's Law and Coaxial Cables

AI Thread Summary
Ampère's Law indicates that in a coaxial cable with equal and opposite currents in the core and shield, the magnetic field outside the outer conductor is zero due to the cancellation of currents. This can be challenging to visualize near the outer conductor, but the principle remains that the net current is zero. When there is no current in the core and only in the shield, the magnetic field in the region between the center and the shield is also zero. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the behavior of magnetic fields in coaxial cables. The discussion emphasizes the importance of visualizing current arrangements and their effects on magnetic fields.
xareu
Messages
25
Reaction score
6
I have a doubt about Ampère's that keeps me awake at night haha, but I think that for a more knowledgeable person it may seem pretty obvious. I've seen in several books that, in a coaxial cable with equal and opposed currents in the core and shield, the magnetic field outside the outer conductor is zero, after using Ampères Law (the summation of the currents in a loop around the whole cable, with opposite currents, is 0, assuming that in this particular arrangement H and dl have the same direction). Leaving apart the calculation, for me it's difficult to visualize it in the points which lay very close to the outer conductor. How can the field be zero there?
In the same cable, but with no current in the core conductor, only in the screen, is there field in the region from the centre to the shield?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xareu said:
In the same cable, but with no current in the core conductor, only in the screen, is there field in the region from the centre to the shield?
No, the field would be 0 in that region.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top