Douglas Adams May Have Had It Right

  • Thread starter Thread starter Questman
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the parallels between Douglas Adams' Infinite Improbability Drive (IID) and concepts in quantum mechanics. It critiques the notion that Adams' comedic sci-fi writing can be linked to serious scientific theories, suggesting that while Adams intended his work as fiction, the IID concept may have a basis in theoretical computation. The idea is presented that a robust computer or hypercomputer could potentially simulate multiple world-states, akin to the IID, allowing an observer to experience these states as if they were real. This perspective posits that the IID is more feasible than traditional sci-fi concepts like faster-than-light travel, indicating a deeper connection between Adams' imaginative ideas and emerging scientific theories in quantum computing.
Questman
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Has anybody else noticed any similarity between Douglas Adams' Infinite Improbability Drive And Quantum Mechanics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you being funny and cute at the same time by extending on the work of a sci-fi comedy writer?

If you’re suggesting Adams has anything to do with “real” science; that best fits with the meaning of another book title “Not Even Wrong” as just another level of comedy.
Similar to the Peter Woit description & claim of String Theory as something of a bad joke.
At least his writing is intended as science.
Adams intends his stuff to be read as fiction and comedy fiction at that.
 
RandallB said:
Adams intends his stuff to be read as fiction and comedy fiction at that.

Although Adams is known for comedic sci-fi, "Last Chance to See" is neither comedy, nor fiction.
 
well- it turns out that Adam's IID is actually something you could program a robust computer or hypercomputer to do- if you could build one- and an idealized quantum computer would provide a source of hypercomputation as a transfinite or infinite state Turing machine [ http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0209332 ]an observer with direct access to a hypercomputer could program it to search for and access world-states where some desired result existed along with a copy of the observer's state within the local state computed- this would be the equivalent of 'transferring' the observer into the quantum simulation of that world-state and to them it would seem exactly like moving to that space in 'reality'- from the perspective of Unitary Quantum Mechanics the simulated quantum state would actually be an 'analog' computation of a real parallel universe- so Douglas wasn't just being creative- something like an IID is actually achievable - certainly more achievable than more mundane sci-fi ideas like FTL starships are!
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
4K
Replies
138
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top