Drag Force Equation Useless in Finding Terminal Velocity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the utility of the drag force equation in determining terminal velocity, particularly in the context of a quarter's fall through air. Participants explore the relationship between drag force, weight, and terminal velocity, while debating the effectiveness of the drag force equation in practical applications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that the drag force equation is ineffective for finding terminal velocity, as it leads to circular reasoning and results in the trivial equation W=W.
  • Another participant counters that the drag force equation is useful when the drag coefficient (Cd) is known, allowing for the calculation of terminal velocity directly.
  • A participant provides specific values for a quarter's dimensions and weight, demonstrating how to calculate terminal velocity using the drag force equation and arriving at a numerical result.
  • Some participants discuss the iterative process of estimating Cd and recalculating terminal velocity based on the Reynolds number, suggesting that convergence on a solution is possible.
  • Discrepancies arise regarding the calculated terminal velocity of the quarter, with one participant claiming a value of 83.136 mph, while others suggest it should be around 14 m/s or 30 mph.
  • Participants express confusion over unit conversions and the appropriate use of weight in Newtons versus grams, as well as the correct cross-sectional area for calculations.
  • Several participants seek clarification on the use of mathematical symbols in their posts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the utility of the drag force equation for finding terminal velocity, with participants presenting competing views and calculations. Disagreements also exist regarding the correct values for terminal velocity and the appropriate units to use.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their calculations, including potential errors in unit conversions and assumptions regarding the drag coefficient. The discussion reflects a variety of approaches to the problem without resolving the underlying disagreements.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying fluid dynamics, physics students working on related homework problems, or individuals curious about the practical applications of drag force equations in real-world scenarios.

picklefeet
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
As most of you know, the drag force equation is Fd=1/2*p*Cd*V^2*Cd*Ac.
At terminal velocity, Fd equals weight. If you find the value of all the variables except Cd and V, you still won't have anything. But the terminal velocity equation is Vt= sqrrt of 2weight/p*Cd*Ac. So if V is terminal velocity, it is reasonable to conclude that V^2 is equivalent to 2W/p*Cd*Ac. So if you replace V^2 with what I've stated above, you'd get W= 1/2p*Cd*2W/p*Cd*Ac.
This equation is true, but only because it cancels out everything but W. You are left with W=W. This is useless for finding Cd. You could also do the opposite. Replace Cd with (1/V^2*2weight)
pAcCd

In this case everything cancels out too. In conclusion, this formula is useless in finding terminal velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, no. Clearly the formula is useful for finding terminal velocity of an object with a known drag coefficient.
 
Since I am assuming that you are carrying this over from the previous thread about the quarter...

I'm going to neglect the buoyant force...
[tex]F_d = W[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{2} \rho V^2 A C_d = m*g[/tex]

For air you can use STP value of :
[tex]\rho = 1.201 \frac{kg}{m^3}[/tex]

[tex]\mu = 1.79 x 10^{-5} \frac{N*s}{m^2}[/tex]

The quarter has values of:
[tex]d = 24.15 mm[/tex]
[tex]A = 4.522 x 10^{-4} m^2[/tex]
[tex]m=5.67 x 10^{-3} kg[/tex]

So now we have:
[tex]\frac{1}{2}\left(1.201 \frac{kg}{m^3}\right)\left(V^2\right)\left(4.522 x 10^{-4} m^2\right)\left(C_d\right) = \left(5.67 x 10^{-3} kg\right)\left(9.81 \frac{m}{s^2}\right)[/tex]

[tex]V^2 C_d = 206.22 \frac{m^2}{s^2}[/tex]

Now, it just so happens, that if you look up the drag coefficient for a circular flat plate, perpendicular to flow,
it is a relatively constant value of 1.1 which makes this a trivial solution.

[tex]V = \sqrt{\frac{206.22 \frac{m^2}{s^2}}{1.1}}[/tex]

[tex]V = 13.69 \frac{m}{s}[/tex]

However, if you did not have a constant [tex]C_d[/tex] you would guess at the [tex]C_d[/tex] and calculate the resultant [tex]V[/tex].

From that [tex]V[/tex] you would then calculate the Reynolds Number for that flow using

[tex]Re = \frac{\rho*V*D}{\mu}[/tex]

You would then use the calculated Reynolds Number and look up on a chart the corresponding [tex]C_d[/tex]. If that value you
just looked up comes very close to your guess, you are done. If it isn't, use the new value of [tex]C_d[/tex] you just looked up
and recalculate the velocity. Repeat the Reynolds Number calculation to get another [tex]C_d[/tex] value.

Keep doing that until you converge on a solution. It shouldn't take that many iterations to solve it.

The fact that you got W=W in your result means that you had circular reasoning in your analysis. You did some algebra on the original equation and then plugged it right back into the original equation. If you do that I should hope you get W=W.
 
Last edited:
russ_watters said:
Well, no. Clearly the formula is useful for finding terminal velocity of an object with a known drag coefficient.

The fact is, if I already knew the Cd, I wouldn't have to use the Fd equation.
I'd just use the terminal velocity equation of Vt= sqrt 2weight
pAcCd
And I did find the terminal velocity ofa quarter. It's 83.136 miles per hour (rounded to the nearest thousandth.) on a different not, How do I use the mathematical symbols? i can't find them.
 
picklefeet said:
The fact is, if I already knew the Cd, I wouldn't have to use the Fd equation.
I'd just use the terminal velocity equation of Vt= sqrt 2weight
pAcCd
But the terminal velocity equation is derived from Fd = Weight. You're going in a circle again.
And I did find the terminal velocity ofa quarter. It's 83.136 miles per hour (rounded to the nearest thousandth.)
You're way off, you slipped a digit or two somewhere. Per Fred's response, the terminal velocity of a quarter falling belly up is about 14m/s, or a mere 30 mph.
 
I'm realize now that I placed the decimal point one space to the left while figuring out the cross-sectional area (oops). But for some reason I don't see where you got 30 m.p.h. If I plug in 1.17 for Cd, 11.34 g. for weight, .46353465 m^2 for Ac and 1.184 for air density, I get about 10.9914 miles per hour. My problem might be the units I'm using. If so, please correct me. thanks.
 
You need to use Newtons for the weight, not grams. Also, your area is off. Take a look at my post and you'll see that the area is [tex]A = 4.522 x 10^{-4} m^2[/tex]
 
Thanks for the info. For the cross-sectional area, do I use centimeters or meters? And I still don't know where to find the mathematical symbols to put in my replies. Can you tell me where they are?
 
  • #10
Thank you to all who helped me with this problem. And thanks for the link to the mathematical symbols.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K