Drake Equation: Parameters, Missed Factors & Technical Limits

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter toph
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
toph
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am not sure if this is in the correct forum, please move if required. I know this equation is not really suited to this forum but i think a discussion about some of the Drake equations parameters are.

First please see,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_Equation

If unsure of what Drakes equation is.

Please disregard the fact that most/all of the values for the given parameters are unquantifiable. My interest in this is not so much the discussion that inteligent life may exist beyond Earth, but more towards the parameters Drake chose for his equation and whether you think any are misguided or just plain wrong!

My questions in relation to this are,
1) Do you think this equation misses out any parameters? if so what?

2) Given that distance will be a major factor in any detection method, are there any current technical limits that restrict estimating the given parameters?

3) If there is a missing parameter and its value was zero then the probability of life beyond Earth is also zero, can you think of anything that drake may have left out that would give a null value?

4) If you could ask Drake one question about his equation what would it be?

Thanks for your comments
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think Drake left a wholle world of paparmeters out of his equation partly because they are unanswerable or because he just couldn't imagine them.

We do not know, all these decades after Drake wrote, what are the true boundaries of life or the actual parameterization of the totally unknown requirements for the rise of technology-using life. So the whole Drake effort to parametrize our ignorance looks to me like a mug's game.
 
selfAdjoint said:
I think Drake left a wholle world of paparmeters out of his equation partly because they are unanswerable or because he just couldn't imagine them.

This is the crux of what i was considering, what parameters do you think he missed out?

i think he missed out a parameter for the fraction of planetary systems with a stable planetary system.

i.e no planetary migration.

Is this even a consideration?