Drinking bird upsized, anchored barge.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Regularguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bird
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of scaling up the classic "drinking bird" device to generate measurable power while addressing safety concerns related to methylene chloride. The original device operates on evaporative heat flux, producing minimal power output, with efficiency around 0.01%. Suggestions include anchoring the device on a barge in a stable environment, like Lake Mead, to enhance its operation. Despite humorous aspirations for a Nobel Prize, participants acknowledge the impracticality of the concept for generating electrical power. The original inventor's patent expired in 1966, allowing for potential experimentation without legal restrictions.
Regularguy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, first time poster here- not college educated, as my handle suggest ... Just a regular guy :) I was reading "The physics book" today (Clifford A. Pickover) and came across the classic "drinking bird" where the body is filled with methylene chloride, the head covered in a felt material - basically a heat engine. Obviously in stable conditions like a room where there is no wind or possibility of disruption the only thing keeping this device from running for a reeeeally long time (please note I didn't say PMM) would be the water supply. Water in a bowl would evaporate relatively fast ... But what if we scaled the bird up and engineered it with safeguards (especially concerning the Methylene chloride) mounted it to a barge floating in the middle of lake Meade (yes, I live in Vegas) and then anchored the barge to the lake bed and we let the bird drink (so to speak)

Could this produce measurable power? How about in a large pond on an Ohio farm? Math, engineering & physics are not my strong suits so I leave this up to you - the true scientists to answer this question... Please be gentle- Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
According to wikipedia:
An analysis showed that the evaporative heat flux driving a small bird was about 1⁄2 W, whereas the mechanical power expressed in bird's motion was about 120,000 W. The system efficiency is about 0.01%. More practically, about 11,000,000 W can be extracted from the bird, either with a coil/magnet or a ratchet used to winch paperclips.

1 hp = 746 W, so just do the math to size your bird accordingly!
 
jack action said:
According to wikipedia:


1 hp = 746 W, so just do the math to size your bird accordingly!

Oh man I am totally doing this! Nobel Prize here I come!
 
No nobels for you, A) it's worthless (but thanks for taking time to humor us with your wit) B) if it wasn't worthless it would belong to the original inventor (which it actually does - patented in 1946)
 
I had one of the "drinking birds" and it was NOT useless! It gave me and my friends hours of amusement. But certainly useless for generating electrical power!

By the way, if the inventor received a patent for it in 1946, that patent expired twenty years later, in 1966 (unless he went through the patent renewal process).
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top