Driven Harmonic Oscillator where Mass Hits Ground

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a driven, damped harmonic oscillator where the mass can collide with a wall or ground. Participants explore how these collisions affect the system's behavior, particularly regarding energy transfer, amplitude equations, and the impact on the amplitude-frequency relationship. The scope includes theoretical modeling and analysis of oscillatory motion under varying conditions of elasticity and driving forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the dynamics change when the mass touches the ground, suggesting that oscillation complexity may depend on forcing amplitude and spring parameters.
  • Another participant notes that the nature of collisions (elastic vs. inelastic) significantly influences the system's behavior, indicating that completely inelastic collisions would simplify the analysis.
  • There is a proposal to analytically derive the energy transferred to the ground during inelastic collisions, considering spring parameters and driving frequency.
  • A participant emphasizes the need for a complete description of the system, including energy input and damping mechanisms, suggesting that without energy addition, the mass would only hit the ground once.
  • One participant describes a scenario where the ground is driven, raising the question of how inelastic impacts alter the amplitude-frequency plot, suggesting that energy input prevents the system from dying out.
  • Another participant elaborates on the implications of collisions on the natural frequency and phase relationship of the mass, proposing that collisions may lead to a higher effective natural frequency and affect amplitude efficiency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the effects of inelastic collisions and energy transfer, indicating that multiple competing views remain regarding the dynamics of the system. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the implications of these factors.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about collision elasticity, the need for a complete system description, and the dependence on specific driving conditions and parameters. Unresolved mathematical steps regarding energy transfer and amplitude equations are also noted.

Nefertiti
I started to ponder following problem. I have a driven, damped oscillator where the mass is free to vibrate in y-direction. If I put a wall or a ground near the mass, the mass touches it if the drive amplitude is larger than the distance to the ground. How does this change the normal dynamics. I would expect that the oscillation becomes pretty complex depending on forcing amplitude and spring parameters. Is it possible to derive the amplitude equation for given frequency and spring parameters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would depend on how elastic the collisions were.

Assuming massless springs, rigid weights, etc:
If the collisions were completely inelastic, the results would be fairly simple because the new velocity (zero) would not depend on the incident velocity.
Generally, on collision the velocity of the oscillating weight would change by a factor of "a" in the y direction where 0>=a>=-1.
 
Assuming inelastic collision, would it be possible to analytically derive the amount of energy transferred to the ground? Especially considering the spring parameters and the driving frequency.
 
If you know the frequency, it should be easy to model the system.
You really haven't described the whole system. Are you pumping energy into this system? What is causing the "damping", friction in the spring?, a function of the velocity?
If it's inelastic and you are not going to add energy to the system, it will hit the floor once and then never again.
 
I'm considering following scenario. The "ground" to which the spring is attached, is driven with n=C*Cos(wt). The natural frequency for this setup can be solved when there is no impact with the wall. Now I'm considering the case where there is an impact with the spring-mass and the wall. The impact should be inelastic but as the "ground" is driven, there is energy so that movement doesn't die out. The question is: is the amplitude-frequency plot altered by these non-elastic impacts?
PhysPhorum.png
 
Nefertiti said:
The natural frequency for this setup can be solved when there is no impact with the wall. Now I'm considering the case where there is an impact with the spring-mass and the wall. The impact should be inelastic but as the "ground" is driven, there is energy so that movement doesn't die out. The question is: is the amplitude-frequency plot altered by these non-elastic impacts?
If you look at the weight cycling at it's natural frequency, it will follow the sine function. If we consider the point when it is closest to the wall to be the 0-degree and 360-degree position, then what happens when it hits the wall will be that it will suddenly skip from a position such as 350 degrees to the 0 degree position.
Thus the new "natural frequency" will be higher and will be dependent on how much energy is added on each cycle.

If the w in the C cos(wt) is not changed, the collision will cause the weight to fall out of phase with N. So if the w is kept at the original natural frequency, a series of collisions (a series could be just one collision) will put the weight sufficiently out of phase that the weight will not efficiently increase the amplitude. Then the system will begin to recover - eventually bringing the weight into phase and increasing the amplitude thus setting it up for the next series of collisions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K